I bet the same people saying "let this kid who did well for the under 20's is on the cusp of a Saxons call up have a chance" would scream for Lancaster's head if it didn't work and England lost to Scotland for example
some of the players suggested (Clegg, Ford, May) are big risks, and may well lose it and do a Mathew Tait debut of course they may not, but the post above mentions picking youngsters and testing them whilst also mentioning the same attitude winning the tournament, wrong if you're going to pick youngsters they need to be given time and may well have some shaky moments to begin with and bottle a match, the idea is that with persistence they learn and will perhaps win 2 years time
I'm not saying it's wrong to pick youngsters, but it's easy for people to say it when your job and reputation for future jobs isn't on the line