S
snoopy snoopy dog dog
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div>
As far as I can see, this is merely a case of his agent flying a kite, trying to up his salary. My question is, would he be a success in Union if he did make the transition?
I guess that he wouldn't. League players don't get the same amount of time on the ball when they move to Union. For example, a standoff in League has 10 yards between himself and the defence when he gets the pill in his hands. In Union that space doesn't exist unless the flyhalf stands deep in the pocket. In that case they stunt any opportunity for those outside them. League players who succeed when they move across are generally wingers who have more running room in front of them i.e. more time to think and use their obvious skills. Would Thurston have the required tactical appreciation to be a success and if not, at 26 years old is it too late to teach him?
Thurston is a tremendous League player but to spend $1million per year on him when you're unsure how well he'd translate to a different sport would be extremely foolish in my opinion. Spend the money bringing Greg Inglis to Union instead .
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,2...2-23217,00.html
North Queensland Cowboys halfback Johnathan Thurston wants $1 million a season from the Australian Rugby Union to switch codes.
Thurston's hefty asking price became public knowledge as dual international Wendell Sailor urged the Cowboys, Queensland and Kangaroos maestro to remain in the NRL, saying he would be "bored to tears" in rugby. The Kangaroos playmaker stunned rugby league when he revealed that he was contemplating a cross-code switch with a view to representing Australia at the 2011 Rugby World Cup.
But Thurston's manager, Sam Ayoub, says the star halfback will seek a seven-figure sum to change codes.
"He'd have to look for at least a million dollars (to go to rugby)," Ayoub said.
"It would take a lot to entice him away from what he has got in rugby league. He has representative opportunities, and he loves playing for Queensland and Australia.
"An asking price like that would not be unreasonable for one of the best players in the world."
The Australian Rugby Union is almost certain to baulk at Thurston's price tag, with Wallabies five-eighth Matt Giteau and former skipper Stirling Mortlock understood to be the union's top earners with base deals around $500,000 a season.
With match payments, a top Wallabies player stands to pocket around $700,000 annually, excluding private sponsorships.
Thurston could earn $1 million a year in rugby with endorsements, but Sailor believes the Cowboys star should abandon any notion of switching codes.
"I personally hope he stays in the NRL," said Sailor, whose NRL stints with Brisbane Broncos and St George Illawarra were punctuated by a five-season tenure in rugby.
"He would get bored to tears with the style of the game (in rugby).
"Of the guys that have gone over to rugby, most have come back, as I did.
"Rugby league has a better brand, there is no doubt about that. Rugby union at the moment is a bore-athon.
"The one thing rugby can offer you is a great lifestyle. Thursto could play at Twickenham, in South Africa, France and Japan.
"His body has taken a fair bit of a whack so it depends on what Thursto wants.
"But I think JT would get so bored that he wouldn't know what to do. He would succeed at the game with ease but he would get so bored with it, simple as that.
"He's a player who would love confrontation, (but) he wouldn't make many tackles (in rugby), he wouldn't be in the game as much.
"If he wants a new experience, good luck to him. But I reckon he'd really miss rugby league."
Gold Coast ***ans utility Mat Rogers, another dual international, is also adamant that Thurston will miss the week-to-week passion of the NRL if he switches codes.
"If he has a goal and wants to do it for the right reasons, I'd wish him all the best," the former Wallabies utility said.
"I have no doubts he would play for Australia. A lot of league players who go to union would play for Australia.
"But it's not a simple transition. There's a lot to it.
"I don't know his rugby background but he's a natural footballer, he just knows where to be.
"As a single bloke travelling around the world, it can be the best time of your life.
"But the tribalism that surrounds rugby league, I love that. I love the fans, I love going to a Leichhardt Oval or Shark Park. You don't experience that in Australian rugby. You play Super 14 and Tests, and it's a different audience.
"If he goes, he will play for the Wallabies, absolutely.
"I'd play him at 10. He couldn't play halfback, he's a ball player, he'd kill it at five-eighth."
The Sunday Mail (Qld)[/b]
As far as I can see, this is merely a case of his agent flying a kite, trying to up his salary. My question is, would he be a success in Union if he did make the transition?
I guess that he wouldn't. League players don't get the same amount of time on the ball when they move to Union. For example, a standoff in League has 10 yards between himself and the defence when he gets the pill in his hands. In Union that space doesn't exist unless the flyhalf stands deep in the pocket. In that case they stunt any opportunity for those outside them. League players who succeed when they move across are generally wingers who have more running room in front of them i.e. more time to think and use their obvious skills. Would Thurston have the required tactical appreciation to be a success and if not, at 26 years old is it too late to teach him?
Thurston is a tremendous League player but to spend $1million per year on him when you're unsure how well he'd translate to a different sport would be extremely foolish in my opinion. Spend the money bringing Greg Inglis to Union instead .