Meh, big backs be over rated. Wales showed today that you can be massively ineffectual with large backs while the nippier Argentines gave them a run around. Pick your best players and tailor your game plan to fit.
Our problem on the weekend was the lack of SOB and Ferris. Starting Henderson could have somewhat offset this. As is, we could have easily won if Heaslip had stayed on the pitch.
For me our best back line sees McFadden and Cave in the centres and Zebo, Bowe and Earls in the back three. While none of them are particularly big lads, they're all good players. No problem with stepping around teams or playing out wide. Bosh rugby isn't the only way to do things and in my mind is far less ineffective than brains in the back line. Hence our Brian still being a better centre than Tualagi, Roberts, and numerous other bosh merchants.
I didn't see Wales game but judging by reports, Wales just having a bad day looks to be the main reason for the result. There bash play has payed off big time wit them, look at 6 nations this year WC last year, Davies try this year, steam rolled two/three of our players and over the line. North the same.
SOB and Ferris are huge loss, as the guys were saying earlier, missing O'brian and Ferris means we don't have huge back row ball carriers that can come off a ruck, pull in players and off load cleanly in a tackle to the fast moving backs, that's what we do well when we have them and when our backs click.But a bit more bulk in our centers and add in our fast pace wingers and that is a recipe for success.Look at NZ, I think NZ s back three, Dagg and Savea in particular, scored something like 80% of their Rugby championship trys