• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

England World Cup Squad

It's per season is it not? So maybe he thought it wasn't worth making wholesale changes with just the summer games to bed them all in.

I'm not saying I agree, I'm simply trying to think of a reason why.
 
Becca said:
I'm hoping for a big change but just don't trust we'll get one 🙄
Click to expand...
Same here. There probably will be a decent amount of change purely based upon the age profile of the squad.

From the RWC squad, Marler, Cole, Lawes, Tuilagi and May will probably retire from England duty.

Youngs probably never will, but it's irrelevant if he's not being picked anyway.

Farrell will never retire from England duty. He'll keep playing on for as long as he can like Sexton. Borthwick just needs to be strong enough to leave him out.

Others like Billy and Daly are young enough to stay there, but have passed their best and shouldn't be included.

Unless the proposed 'hybrid contracts' make a difference, Ribbans and Willis are unavailable. Not sure what the situation is with Arundell?

If all of those were left out, that's more than a third of the squad.
 
TRF_Olyy said:
They've announced they're bending the rules for him - available for the 6N but not the summer tour if he extends in France
Click to expand...
Have they actually said that definite?
I read a classic report where the headline said that but actually what they meant was it was still to be decided if they were going to give him the dispensation.
 
As an aside- even though we think SB would never pick him- Sinfield has come out and said Underhill is 100% available for selection for the QF and trained like an animal in the initial camp.

Christ I'd love it if we could get him 20 minutes against Fiji and get ourselves through to the Semis- having someone as physical as him would be a massive boost against the big 4.

(PS of course absolutely expecting hell from Fiji based on the Twickenham performance so by no means writing them off!!) Just wanted to make the point about how much I rate Underhill as an international.
 
BrokenWing said:
It's per season is it not? So maybe he thought it wasn't worth making wholesale changes with just the summer games to bed them all in.

I'm not saying I agree, I'm simply trying to think of a reason why.
Click to expand...
Yeah, he may not have felt it was worth it, but that doesn't mean that he was limited to 5 changes - he had as many changes as he wanted - he just didn't want to use many.
 
Don't Skip Leg Day said:
Ludlum showed physicality and was probably our best backrow and was dropped for Billy last week so what are the chances SB has learnt a lesson and will drop Billy or will he not.

Then how can underhill leap Ludlum who shouldn't have been dropped previously?
Click to expand...

You're applying logic. Please desist immediately.

Underhill wasn't announced until after the match. Lawes had a bad one and I'm wondering if that was what prompted the selection - a run off the bench in the QF with an eye to a possible starting spot in the semi if Lawes has another poor one - Father Time does everyone in the end.

Of course Underhill should have been there in the first place making all this academic. I got a bit flamed for saying that I didn't really see where Ludlam fitted in if everyone was fit and, unfortunately for him, it's played out that way a bit.
 
TommiG88 said:
I would like to see how a underhill, curry and Earl back row would do against fiji
Click to expand...

Would be interesting. All a bit samey though albeit with slightly different strengths.

Pretty sure that Borthwick said that the last batch of players to be canned before the squad was announced would be the first cabs off the rank in the event of injury. Underhill wasn't one of those. I think it's the right call but it's not doing what you say.

He also said that Farrell would be in the team and captain regardless. He may need to rethink that (I mean he won't, but should). The guy's patently out of form. Also bulked up for the centre role making him even slower. At the moment we're a worse team for having him in.
 
he has dropped Farrell before, no reason he wont do it again if hes not performing .....which clearly hes not.
 
Geordiefalcon said:
he has dropped Farrell before, no reason he wont do it again if hes not performing .....which clearly hes not.
Click to expand...
I don't think all the blame can be put on Farrell. There's probably at least 6 players who should not be any where near the first xv at the moment.

I do think we have good players but for some reason they are aweful for England. We look incapable of quick ball. The forwards have been pretty terrible as a whole, so the backs look even worse, we couldn't score off a driving line out maul for love or money. We can't make five passes and produce any width. Would love to know how many turn overs the back three are winning, it seems like none.......i could go on.

Something isn't right and the only thing i can think of is the players are not buying into it. So that's on the coaching team. When SB started he said England were not could at anything. It's pretty safe to say several games later we are worse at everything.
 
Not a fan of calls to drop Ludlam, that is a luxury we can have when we are playing well. At the moment we need players to go out there and do a job and Ludlam has consistently been one of our strongest performers in a dire team, often surpassing the players being viewed on paper as better than him. I am not a fan of rewarding some of the best form in the team with being dropped. Let others take the shirt off him, don't let them get it by default because they may be better on paper or may have a higher ceiling. Let them earn it. As far as I'm concerned, he has earned his spot and many others haven't.
 
Quel Carreleur said:
Yeah, he may not have felt it was worth it, but that doesn't mean that he was limited to 5 changes - he had as many changes as he wanted - he just didn't want to use many.
Click to expand...
Absolutely, but if he'd have been given that option as soon as taking on the job it might have been different. I don't think so, but maybe.
 
Ragey Erasmus said:
Not a fan of calls to drop Ludlam, that is a luxury we can have when we are playing well. At the moment we need players to go out there and do a job and Ludlam has consistently been one of our strongest performers in a dire team, often surpassing the players being viewed on paper as better than him. I am not a fan of rewarding some of the best form in the team with being dropped. Let others take the shirt off him, don't let them get it by default because they may be better on paper or may have a higher ceiling. Let them earn it. As far as I'm concerned, he has earned his spot and many others haven't.
Click to expand...
Even with my Saints bias, i can't see how Underhill walks straight back in. Over the last two years Ludlam has been the better player imo.

We are playing enough players in the they were "good" a few years ago so might "get good" as it is. Plus what does it say about Borthwick if in his first 15/23 are now three players who weren't even deemed good enough for the announced tournament squad.
 
Was looking at players coming through and was wondering at Bath what is the plans for Bailey?
For me he looks like he could be a great 12, but you have Redpath and Ojomoh. I don't feel Bailey is a proper 10, so is the plan to have him at 15?

Was looking at centres Lozowski is kinda depressing starting 13 for the prem champions literally plays in any position, goal kicks.

Feels like one of the biggest wastes considering how little injuries he has had. Wondered if he went to a club and focused purely at 12 he might have gotten more chances?
12. Loz
13. Slade
Would actually be an interesting centre combo I feel.
 
Yeah, I've said it before but Lozowski's exclusion ranks up with Ben Spencer as one of the biggest head scratchers of recent England Rugby years

Covers 10/12/13/15, goal kicks and is surprisingly fast - seems tailor made for the kind of gameplan EJ and SB want but not had a sniff
 

Similar threads

Jaguares
Argentina World Cup Squad
Replies
8
Views
829
argie
argie
Umaga's Witness
All blacks rugby World Cup squad
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
Kiwiwomble
Kiwiwomble
TRF_Olyy
Scotland World Cup Squad
3 4 5
Replies
93
Views
5K
retired9
R
H
Rugby World Cup 2023 - retrospective
2 3
Replies
42
Views
3K
40/20
4
M
RUGBY WORLD CUP COMPETITION
Replies
0
Views
360
missionvale.johnboscocc24
M

Latest posts

Top