- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
- Messages
- 100,019,986
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
NoThe big question is can he last more than 3 games?
NoThe big question is can he last more than 3 games?
That depends, if you limit him to the last 5 minutes of each match... and allow him dispensation to miss the warm-up... and training... Then you might manipulate the odds up to 50:50The big question is can he last more than 3 games?
Manu might be fit this weekend.
Which should mean he has a injury just before the Christmas period and can enjoy a nice relaxing Christmas.
I will say England do miss a fully fit Manu our attack lacks bite in the midfield. The big question is can he last more than 3 games?
Definitely 13. Playing him at 12 would mean completely changing the game plan and when he's as injury prone as he is, changing the game plan to revolve around him this close to the WC simply isn't a gamble worth taking.The worst part is, that's probably true. Last time we joked about how quickly he would get injured, it was correct
Will the wings ever see the ball with Manu on the pitch? Also do we play him at 12 or 13?
Definitely 13. Playing him at 12 would mean completely changing the game plan and when he's as injury prone as he is, changing the game plan to revolve around him this close to the WC simply isn't a gamble worth taking.
Which means we lose JJ or Slade there and potentially less influence for our pacey wingers in favour of bashball. If he passes into space whilst offering the running threat then that's good but if all he does is his usual brainless crashing into contact, he will be a liability. In his short stint last time at club level before injury he more than once butchered overlaps by not even looking outside and just trying to smash players rather than hitting a space. We don't need that sort of idiotic play and if he doesn't start playing more intelligently, I don't want him back.
When Manu last played for England we didn't have the quality of Ford and Farrell at 10 and 12 though. He won't need to be a great passer if he's used well by the more intelligent players around him. He should hold defences and create more space and better ball for our back 3. He may be a blunt weapon but if he's ever fit he's the best at what he does in the world.
All redundant until he proves he can last more than a few weeks, mind.
When he played for Tigers last he butchered 2 clear try scoring opportunities because he would rather smash headlong into a defender and go for glory than give a simple pass to a completely unmarked winger. The second the ball is in his hands, we need him to know when to pass it on. The rest of the team can't cover for his idiocy, what if he is passed the ball with the team expecting him to do the sensible thing of pass just before contact and put someone like May, Watson or Daly away but instead decides he's going to try to prove his manliness with a pointless crash into a ready defender? He has repeatedly shown a lack of intelligence beyond many other stupid rugby players.
If he comes back he MUST play more intelligently.
So much for that then, ay!Manu might be fit this weekend.
So much for that then, ay!
Just like Sale's blind hope that Addison will make it through the captains run one day!Rugby it's tigers the team posted now will no doubt be different to the actual one.