I really rate Lancaster, he's done only good things for us: But, I really hope he can see that playing Farrel at 12 and Barritt 13 is absolute madness - particularly when Barritt is standout at 12 and at 13 you have 3 great options - Tuilagi, Lowe, and Joseph - probably in that order of preference. If there's one thing Farrell has shown it's that he does not need to be babysat by an older guy at 10. So as much as I like and admire Hodgson, I really do think he has limited shelf-life. You still see periodic instances of distributive genius from him, but as a rule that midfield hasn't worked, and as the commentators were harping on about yesterday, our set-piece 'strike-moves' have been awful.
The mad and slightly infuriating thing that Baa baa games is that it's never going to be sufficient basis to change a team. So although Wade and Joseph looked strong, the starting side won't change. in Josephs case I have no problem with this whatsoever, as Tuilagi is the deserved owener of the 13 shirt, despite a below-par performance on Saturday. The other discovery has been Johnson who played very well, but again I can see him making the mid-week 15 but not the test side unless we have injuries. More likely to see (all depending on performance in training, especially for Haskell who is away from the other guys) 6: Hask 7: Robshaw, 19: Dowson. Again, Baa baas games are a great opportunity to blood players, but not sufficient basis to make wholesale changes.
What were peoples views on Paul Doran-Jones yesterday? He escaped my attention. Also, shame Fearns did not appear to have much impact at 7...