Surely, the "even allowing for" tells the entirety of the story.
Some very fair points, but it's just a continuation of a theme of a lack of consistency.
At random, I chose to look at the teams v Scotland in 21, 22 & 23 so pre RWC cut off. I reckon something like 42 separate players were involved in those 3 squads. Only Genge and Itoje started all 3 matches. only 3 further players were involved in all 3 squads
5, 8, 11, 12, 13 had different players every match. Every single unit was different in every single game. You're just not going to get any continuity at all that way.
For the record, starting with 23 and going backwards:
1. Genge x 3
2. George, LCD, George
3. Sinckler x 2, Stuart
4. Itoje x 3
5. Chessum, Isiekwe, Hill
6. Ludlam x 2, Wilson
7. B Curry, T Curry x 2
8. Dombrandt, Simmons, Binny,
9. JVP, Youngs x 2
10. M Smith x 2, Faz
11. OHC, Marchant, May
12. Faz, Slade, Lawrence
13. Marchant, Daly, Slade
14. Malins x 2, Watson
15. Steward x 2, Daly
When thinking of the attacking game, Daly, Faz, Slade and Marchant all started 2 of the games, each time with a different number of their back.
On the bench: apart from 2 appearances from Earl at 20 and Ford at 22, every shirt had a different player every time. Mako, Marler, Obano at 17, LH, Walker, George, LCD at 16 etc.
In this year's match we had something like 5 starters and 6 subs who hadn't been involved at all in any of the previous 3 matches.
We didn't win any of these 4 matches.
Crossing over coaching eras obviously, but I think this is part of what May's talking about.