Jabby your own biases are bertraying you, your still treating it like a stone cold fact NZ would of won had the call been correct. You won't even acknowledge that there is also a not minuscule chance England could of won outright.
And you treat my feeling NZ would of won like I've said NZ would of definitely won...it's more 60% chance in my book.
It was a minor mistake, the major factor was the additional 4 runs which were awarded which was nobodies fault and correctly given.
I acknowledge my biases.
Stokes apologised but then he took the trophy all the same and celebrated. You'll notice in this thread that every England fan acknowledged it was a rubbish way to lose and NZ were unlucky. Now we want to celebrate with him not constantly have our win called into question.
As to giving it a name it may have won in NZ but it will be dismissed as hoo haa about nothing in England. In fact pretty much already has. At most it'll be like the goal in 66 an anecdote, a what if,a maybe. Nobody cheated and we have nothing to feel bad about unlike the Hand of God.
