Despite getting the win, if I'm Crowley I'm not impressed with the Canadian effort. We got caught with our hands in the ruck way too often and had way too many unforced errors. Initially I was sceptical about the inclusion of Scholz in what appeared to be a first choice Canadian side, but he may have played his way out of the first XV with a handful of knock on's.
Scrums were damn good though. Props to the props, especially Buydens. As far as the forwards went, he impressed me the most.
However, the lineout in today's game was about as bad as Canada has ever seen. Seriously, Canada probably won 15% of their own ball. Against the U.S. that might not hurt you, but Tonga and Japan will make you pay for it bad. If Canada could have kept posession on 80% of their lineouts they could have easily tacked another two or three tries on to the final scoreline.
Also, good defence in the second half. Clive Griffith's impact on the squad has been a positive one.
Things that I think
- Too many unforced errors. Perhaps a lack of focuss?
- Scholz won't be starting next game or at the WC. Not the smoothest of games for him.
- Lineouts will be a huge focuss in training this upcoming week. The Yanks seemed to have cracked the code.
- Buydens and Marshall are without a doubt our best loosehead and tighthead.
- Jebb Sinclair had a damn good game (with the exception being his knock-on when Fairhurst had the quick tap that could have easily led to a try at the end of the first half.
- Everyone knows I like Evans at fullback due to his creativity, but I think if it wouldn't be a bad idea to try him at inside centre (he did play flyhalf for Canada at the U-19 level). Him and DTH would give Canada a centre pairing that could score some serious points. It would also allow Pritchard to slot into fullback, while bringing in Hearn (his long leg is an asset) to supplement the more speedy Mackenzie on the wing. The more ball DTH and Evans see, the better the odds are of Canada winning. In the event that doesn't happen, put Mackenzie back at inside centre. All of this, of course, is dependable on the fitness of Evans and whether or not the injury he picked up today is serious.
- The American kicking game was not international calibre. What happened to Mike Hercus? It looks like they don't have many options at 10 and 12 except Samoan ex-pats with twitchy feet.
- The scrum has improved by leaps and bounds from last year. The scrum camp with Mike Cron payed off in a big way.
- As I was watching the game on TSN today, it dawned on me that Monro is a lot better than people give him credit for. He's good in defence and has very good distribution skills.
- The U.S. seem to be succumbing to what used to plague Canada; their fitness lets them down early in the second half.
- Todd Clever is a damn good player that could probably get caps on a home nations side. He is without a doubt the best American in rugby.
- Will the altitude of Colorado affect Canada in the next game?
All in all, a win is a win. Pleased to get it, but not in the fashion it happened. If Canada can get their lineout back to where it was at the Churchill Cup they should win the second game. This is assuming they can withstand an early American storm which is sure to have them going backwards for the first ten minutes.
Hopefully a more convincing win is in the cards next week.
Also, the pitch looked immaculate!
Go Canada!