• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Antisocial, societal issues thread

How many juvenile on juvenile murders have there been that are incel related though? (talking about 13 on 13 or younger like in the show) and on top of that how many are from families like that? I know they picked a normal family on purpose to show this could be your kid but what are the chances really? I didn't find the boy believable at all. Very well acted though.
 
How many juvenile on juvenile murders have there been that are incel related though? (talking about 13 on 13 or younger like in the show) and on top of that how many are from families like that? I know they picked a normal family on purpose to show this could be your kid but what are the chances really? I didn't find the boy believable at all. Very well acted though.
Not watched show so can't comment too much. I think the bigger concern ftom what youve said is radicalisisation of young boys by the likes of Andrew Tate that it's addressing (which is a huge problem has led to all kinds of abuses) rather than a specific incident.

Although I'm unsure how prevalent it is, feels like the height of that was a couple years ago. Or people just stopped reporting on it.
 
Not watched show so can't comment too much. I think the bigger concern ftom what youve said is radicalisisation of young boys by the likes of Andrew Tate that it's addressing (which is a huge problem has led to all kinds of abuses) rather than a specific incident.

Although I'm unsure how prevalent it is, feels like the height of that was a couple years ago. Or people just stopped reporting on it.
It definitely raises a lot of very real and serious problems I think they've just taken it to the extreme and trying to portray it as a reality. But it's very well done and I enjoyed it even though I didn't really fully buy it.
 
It definitely raises a lot of very real and serious problems I think they've just taken it to the extreme and trying to portray it as a reality. But it's very well done and I enjoyed it even though I didn't really fully buy it.
So to answer this a little, and I'm not an expert but work with teen boys, mostly ex or current offenders and in a number of high schools doing up stream service work...

The prevelance and chance of 'incel' related violent crime is non existent in comparison to violent male offenders in general.

The Tate issue was never a real thing IMHO, no radicalisation happened that I ever saw, either in the prisons, or schools, female teachers had a rough time for a couple of months from gobby little buggers asking what colour their Lamborghini is etc, and quite a lot of these boys were criminalised for hate crimes, mostly for things they said online, but I promise there hasn't been a swathe of violent crimes against women inspired by online dickheads lol, well certainly not from 'incel' types.

I havnt seen the series so can't comment, but to put things into perspective prisons, homeless charities, high schools, probation services etc all run regular misogyny, mental health, and emotional wellbeing sessions.
 
The Tate issue was never a real thing IMHO, no radicalisation happened that I ever saw,
Except for the people who were on his advice essentially becoming pimps for their girlfriends by coercing them into OnlyFans and the like.

Radicalisation isn't about the majority who mostly just becomes little arseholes but the extremely minority who do evil ****.



This is a pretty great podcast on the issue with an interview with an investigative jounalist and basically how the surface level your talking about goes deeper and deeper. But against your talking about a miniority who go in hard.
 
Except for the people who were on his advice essentially becoming pimps for their girlfriends by coercing them into OnlyFans and the like.

Radicalisation isn't about the majority who mostly just becomes little arseholes but the extremely minority who do evil ****.



This is a pretty great podcast on the issue with an interview with an investigative jounalist and basically how the surface level your talking about goes deeper and deeper. But against your talking about a miniority who go in hard.

Except we are talking in context of 'incel' types, who by their very nature don't have girlfriends to pimp out. Also 13 year old British boys have not been pimping out girls and become sex traffickers.

I've worked with maybe 120 male teens and early 20s in the last few years, and not 1 has done anything like this. The vast majority of crime occurred by teen boys are anti social behaviour, theft and property damage. These boys don't have the capability, awareness or skillset to pull off elaborate sex trafficking schemes, or manipulation. Infact most of these boys are far more at risk of being honey trapped and run into county lines.

The few cases that could be linked to Tate style manipulation would be the honey trapping girls handlers, who are overwhelmingly NOT 13 year old white 'incel' types.

In my experience radicalisation doesn't happen to boys with fathers at home, and doesn't happen by social media view farmers, if we put radicalisation into teen males risk profile it's overwhelmingly by local gangs, exploiting a lack of support network, and desperation for survival.

I've never met a 13 year old perpetrator of any crime that wasn't victimised by people close to them first and foremost.

The only reason the Tate issue irks me so much, is that we have such a high number of immediate risks to young boys and girls, pretending to be alpha males and treating others like lesser is the last of my priorities when risk assessing and setting strategical plans to produce behaviour change.
 
Where did I mention 13 year old boys were doing this?
This is the context of the conversation, you commented on Welsh exiles question about how prevelant juvenile on juvenile (13 on 13) murders were. I responded that it wasn't.

So, Hassan was a foster and residential child, diagnosed as having low capacity, Autism, who was violent from an early age. His interactions with the police from aged 9, culminating on his first arrest at 12 for a knife attack is hardly an Andrew Tate radicalisation case is it?

I dont know the case of Ava White, I'd have to go look into it, your link on Wiki does claim she was playing and drinking alcohol at 12, and charged a group of older boys.

Let me be clear though, I am well aware of teen issues, it's the idea every young man who does something wrong can be attributed to Tate is the ludicrous claim. I just don't see the radicalisation. I'm not sure if you have engaged in any prevent, or radicalisation training, but it all focuses of white Christian radical boys, and Tate specifically (they ignore that he's muslim), when the reality is that this demographic is only a smaller part of risk to society. Gang crime, and drugs are far more of an issue, but it's a far more complex and difficult conversation to have than but muh Tate.

If authorities wanted to use Tate as an example of focusing on what kids watch online, or how dangerous algorithms and outlandish rage is faked for views, I'd be fully behind it. But Tate is just the next boogeyman man on the train of why young boys are bad, along with video games, Boxing, MMA, and the new one misogyny in pornography.

I'll apologise for the rant here, but I recently sat in on a high school session, where a 50 year old nan type police officer sat a targeted at risk group of teen boys down and explained how the porn they watched was disgusting, why they were disgusting for watching it, and even implicated that sex as mild as doggy style was sexual abuse. It went exactly how you expect it would, some walked out, some called her a Peter file, and 3/4s through she threatened to bring in officers to arrest them for mocking her. The amount of work targeted at young men that has good intentions but is embarrassingly not fit for purpose is scary!
 
it's the idea every young man who does something wrong can be attributed to Tate is the ludicrous claim.
Presumably, that's why literally nobody has ever made that claim.
Strawman
1743160085033.jpeg

If authorities wanted to use Tate as an example of focusing on what kids watch online, or how dangerous algorithms and outlandish rage is faked for views
Please note - Netflix isn't "the authorietes", but it IS in the process of making fictional drama.
 
This is the context of the conversation, you commented on Welsh exiles question about how prevelant juvenile on juvenile (13 on 13) murders were. I responded that it wasn't.

So, Hassan was a foster and residential child, diagnosed as having low capacity, Autism, who was violent from an early age. His interactions with the police from aged 9, culminating on his first arrest at 12 for a knife attack is hardly an Andrew Tate radicalisation case is it?

I dont know the case of Ava White, I'd have to go look into it, your link on Wiki does claim she was playing and drinking alcohol at 12, and charged a group of older boys.

Let me be clear though, I am well aware of teen issues, it's the idea every young man who does something wrong can be attributed to Tate is the ludicrous claim. I just don't see the radicalisation. I'm not sure if you have engaged in any prevent, or radicalisation training, but it all focuses of white Christian radical boys, and Tate specifically (they ignore that he's muslim), when the reality is that this demographic is only a smaller part of risk to society. Gang crime, and drugs are far more of an issue, but it's a far more complex and difficult conversation to have than but muh Tate.

If authorities wanted to use Tate as an example of focusing on what kids watch online, or how dangerous algorithms and outlandish rage is faked for views, I'd be fully behind it. But Tate is just the next boogeyman man on the train of why young boys are bad, along with video games, Boxing, MMA, and the new one misogyny in pornography.

I'll apologise for the rant here, but I recently sat in on a high school session, where a 50 year old nan type police officer sat a targeted at risk group of teen boys down and explained how the porn they watched was disgusting, why they were disgusting for watching it, and even implicated that sex as mild as doggy style was sexual abuse. It went exactly how you expect it would, some walked out, some called her a Peter file, and 3/4s through she threatened to bring in officers to arrest them for mocking her. The amount of work targeted at young men that has good intentions but is embarrassingly not fit for purpose is scary!
I'm assuming you raised it with the Police service in question. No such thing as bad feedback and all that.

I agree with a lot of what you raise. Still there's a higher degree of knowing right from wrong, and taking personal responsibility. Nobody should be total blaming Tate, but neither should people rely on but 'Mummy was very bad" or "My friends were mean to me and made me do it" either.
 
Presumably, that's why literally nobody has ever made that claim.
Strawman
View attachment 23185


Please note - Netflix isn't "the authorietes", but it IS in the process of making fictional drama.

If you had spent time in any of the charitable sector, prisons, PRUs or high schools dealing with issues effecting young people, you would know that thisnisnt a strawman, and that Tate style radicalisation is blamed constantly.
 
I'm assuming you raised it with the Police service in question. No such thing as bad feedback and all that.

I agree with a lot of what you raise. Still there's a higher degree of knowing right from wrong, and taking personal responsibility. Nobody should be total blaming Tate, but neither should people rely on but 'Mummy was very bad" or "My friends were mean to me and made me do it" either.

Of course, criticising the police, and offering them feedback on their failings always produces great results and optimisation of services going forward.

I agree 100% that accountability is important, but some of the stats regarding this issue would terrify you.

Low IQ, low cognitive ability, ADHD, Autism, and others serious empathy effecting issues like FAS, CP, and APD are hugely prevelant in thos demographic. This is before you consider how they have been developmentally effected by ACEs, trauma, and regularly neglect or abuse.

The biggest risks currently by far in a lot of major UK cities is gang crime / drug crime. These young boys usually come from broken homes, confusing backgrounds, poverty is rife, confusing cultures, with a total lack of preventative measures to help them succeed.

Now Andrew Tates messaging of being tough, training hard, being a bad ass, earning millions and using women just don't apply to these kids who don't understand. They are semi feral in a lot of cases, and live in survival mode. Noone seems to understand how living in a constant state of adrenaline fueled fight or flight mode for years effects developing neural pathways.

What I do know is the current state of behaviour change strategies aren't proving successful, middle aged out of touch middle class politicians, writing plans based on upper class PHD level researchers studies just isn't working.
The only thing I've ever seen being semi effective if strong male role models within their own community.
 
Anyone else find this a bit fascinating...

There are a number of oddities in this story. Studies criminology, obsessed with horror movies, ASD, it's been comment that he hated women but not sure where that's come from, travelled from London to Brighton and stayed in a Travel lodge before committing the murder, collected knives...

There's more to this, too much doesn't make sense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Top