TobesHodges
Bench Player
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2015
- Messages
- 978
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
It's like Larksea said 3 guys in the backs arn't going to make it that deserve to be there, just because of the depth in NZ rugby is so good..
It's like Larksea said 3 guys in the backs arn't going to make it that deserve to be there, just because of the depth in NZ rugby is so good..
I'm Naholo's biggest fan and was devastated with his injury and there's no way I can endorse him going over Skudder and Piutau who both have proven themselves. It's just really unfortunate for Naholo, really sad. I just can't see the selectors making a call like that, especially given how controversial his injury recovery has been.
Yeah there does seem to be an increasing amount of whispers (between fans and scribes - not sure if any have the inside word or are just summizing) that Sopoaga will lose out to Slade. It does seem logical because versatility is always the winner at World Cups. Like everyone has pointed out, a few really good players will have to miss out. The more versatile you are, the greater your chance imo (even Dagg has a few extra party tricks other than playing fullback. He can slot on to the wing and can kick goals.)
yeah but Barritt and Slade are basically the same player with different coloured hair - why take both?
Leave one and take Sopoaga.
yeah but Barritt and Slade are basically the same player with different coloured hair - why take both?
Leave one and take Sopoaga.
All the All Black contenders looked good. Part from maybe Messam.
Goes to show the class/cut above for some of these extraordinary players and we can have confidence with who ever goes, even Dagg.
I don't think Jane is a good idea over Piutau because of his injury history and lack of game time in a Black jersey this year. Piutau has been the more consistent All Black over the past few years as well, he's also younger/fitter and will last longer in a tough knock out tournament. Piutau is undoubtedly a better option than Jane right now, there isn't really a plausible argument about it. If you want to talk about franchise favouritism like you accused me of with Fekitoa, then saying Jane > Piutau is definitely Wellington favouritism.
Smith, Piutau, NMS, Savea should and will be our outside backs. Dagg being the closest contender knowing Hansen rates him and his experience.
Barlow had some good moments, making a case, really don't know if he will go or not, it's tough to say, I feel him and Sopoanga are fighting for a spot.
disagree, the selectors would have to be bonkers to select jane over Piutau, he wasn't just man of the match against South Africa, he was one of the only All Blacks to actually look good against Samoa and he had a really good game against Argentina as well.
The play where Piutau came from the left side to save a try on the right hand side even though he was outnumbered in the springbok test was the kind of play that just might win us the world cup. He booked his ticket that day, dont deny it.
I think maybe some hurricanes bias showing? IMO Accross those first three tests, Piutau was the best and most consistent player of all the players that got a run. And Honestly... I wanted him to fail, I'd much rather we take a guy who's committed to NZRU. But when it comes down too it right now 2015 is all that matters. 2016 can wait, we have to select Piutau.
Loving the bias calls. One of you still thinks Stephen Donald was a great fly half, the other wants half of the Highlanders in the RWC team.
I said I personally would prefer Jane over Piatau for these reasons:
1. Jane is still our best player under the high ball. I would say it is a fair bet there will be plenty of high balls come the knock out stages (anyone bother watching the last semi-final?). It's not an area of weakness of Piatau, but I think Jane would be the best in the world. His defense has also been great this year, tackling at 95% in Super Rugby. Purely looking at the knock out games that is helpful.
2. Cory Jane is contracted past this RWC, and while his best years are probably behind him I do like repaying loyalty. People say things like "it's a RWC year, that's all that matters". Well, it's not really. If you select people based on only a RWC - you see more players taking contracts overseas at a younger age, year after year. It sounds mean spirited, but I am happy for an example to be made of Piatau, particularly when I don't see a massive point of difference between him and other options.
3. I think Piatau is a bit overrated. Yes, I remember him covering beautifully from the right wing against South Africa, stopping a try. Awesome. He had a good game. He had a forgettable season.
4. Really it comes down to who else is selected. I would still say Cory Jane provides a larger point of difference to the other outside backs. I'd certainly like to see
For the last bloody time, it's Piutau. PIUTAU WITH A U.
You take posts and twist them, I merely said Donald wasn't the terrible player people make him out to be and that I liked his story, coming on a kicking the winning penalty. If you even bothered to read my posts, you'd realize I'm talking way more sense than what you do and I said Highlander players shouldn't and won't make it.
Naholo I said shouldn't make it and Sopoanga being the other, unless we choose to drop TKB. What other Highlanders players have I gone on about?
Oh Ben Smith and Fekitoa... wow.
Your Corey Jane post clearly is Wellington favouritism because there's no way he's a better option than Piutau currently, end of story.
Dane Coles
Kevin Mealamu
Codie Taylor
Tony Woodcock
Owen Franks
Wyatt Crockett
Nepo Laulala
Ben Franks
Brodie Rettalick
Sam Whitelock
Luke Romano
Richie McCaw
Keiran Read
Jerome Kaino
Sam Cane
Victor Vito
Liam Messam
Aaron Smith
TJ Perenara
Tawera Kerr-Barlow
Dan Carter
Beauden Barrett
Colin Slade
Ma'a Nonu
Conrad Smith
Malakai Fekitoa
Sonny Bill Williams
Julian Savea
Charles Piutau
Ben Smith
Israel Dagg
3 Specialist locks + Vito and Kaino who can cover if needed. I suspect Vito could start at lock against one of the smaller teams in pool play. Perhaps teaming up with Romano, while Whitelock and Retallick take a rest.
3 guys who can play openside (Messam probably could to at a stretch), 4 guys who can play 8.
I don't think we should take the same risk as Australia with two halfbacks. Three locks, yes, because Vito is very capable and has done it before. Personally I'm just more confident that way. We don't want to use up Slade's versatility too early, because that will leave us short of cover in other areas.
Like Dagg or not, he provides options. He's been in the environment before, he can do the kicking duties if our first five gets injured in a match, and he can slot into wing position. That gives us about 5 guys who can cover winger, plus Fekitoa or SBW probably could get away with playing there against a smaller team if we really had to.
Slade is experienced, can cover a range of positions.
Props and hookers are self explanatory. Charlie Faumauina has simply run out of time.
Carter starting and Barrett on the bench will be the big-match combo (including for Argentina and Tonga) while Slade can probably start against the minnows, with Dagg as immediate back up if he goes down.
1. The Donald point was aimed at Larksea
2. It's Lima Sopoaga. And Cory Jane. If we're criticizing merit based on spelling you're going to be walking some very dangerous ground.
3. I gave my reasons for Cory Jane. If you want to take an isolated example of me preferring one player to another to make a case for favoritism fine - but like all your rugby related posts and opinions, is based on very little.
It's not necessarily just what I want, that's what I think the squad could be. How is Piutau so bad though? Personally I think he's very suited to World Cup style rugby because he has the extra aggression for tight play. He may not have the excellent step of Skudder, but he can bump off tackles when the defense closes up.