- Joined
- Apr 12, 2011
- Messages
- 8,538
- Club or Nation
Nope. The lesson from last week is to ignore the fickle ramblings of half our kiwi members. Funny how Conrad Smith hasn't been congratulated after this match..
Hear,hear!!
Nope. The lesson from last week is to ignore the fickle ramblings of half our kiwi members. Funny how Conrad Smith hasn't been congratulated after this match..
Nope. The lesson from last week is to ignore the fickle ramblings of half our kiwi members. Funny how Conrad Smith hasn't been congratulated after this match..
Nick, you really think last week didn't highlight issues? Fortunately they put in work to fix these issues and we can vent here before they do so discussing it, been satisfied when we see the appropriate changes made or tweaks to improve the performance.
What contributed to this result, was our burning desire to rectify last weeks result, the right changes and the AB deal our revenge very well and use it as a tool of motivation. Cheika's ridiculous selection of Cooper and of course fortress Eden Park. I really wanted Cheika to come here and try win at all costs and see what his starting teams made of. Really stupid to experiment as much as he did. Last week was a winning formula he had found... keep it and tweak it slightly if you need to. Australia had already lost before going on to the park.
Obviously this week showed we do in fact have players who can do that. What we needed was to be more accurate and a change of tactics around the ruck. Not a huge change in personal for a bunch of unproven players. The sensationalism and hyperbole surrounding player performances is beyond ridiculous.
Yup, pretty much this a million times over. I do think one or two very subtle changes could be made now and then, like Crockett being introduced into our strongest side. But Woodcock still has his strengths, brings mountains of experience, and can hang with the best of them. Beyond that, and maybe giving Sam Cane some more game time, I see no reason for radical changes. I thought people were way over the top after that loss to Australia. It was just a bad day at the office, the wrong tactics were used, and the ABs got outplayed as a result. It's no big deal. At worst there are some things to work on. And I'd take that any day over learning nothing.
When you're showing up to an All Black RWC boot camp just 2 months out from the tournament out off shape, so out off shape he wasn't even in the squad for the South Africa game and then when he was finally selected for the Australian game and played terrible then that's not good enough at this level, this isn't a school boys Rugby team where you can slack off over the holidays then return to training and she'll be right, this is the biggest tournament of their careers and a Nations hopes and a lot of peoples dreams weighing on their shoulders. You'd expect better effort mate and we have the tools to replace him if necessary.
For the million and second time, Savea had an asthma attack in South Africa. That was why he wasn't picked. There is a difference between having asthma and being unfit...
He was hardly terrible in either test. Quiet yes.
I don't really think Osbourne is anywhere near All Blacks material, although he's a very solid player. I've been surprised by the amount of whispers there have been this year about how he should be included in the ABs. I don't see any aspect to his game that would baffle or really make international teams struggle. He's a big dude who has done some pretty cool things with an awesome pack in front of him. Nothing more nothing less.
Savea was one of the best players in the world last year! Then he had a good Super Rugby season. Now he has had two indifferent test matches. Surely the lesson we should have gleamed from last night is not to be so reactionary?
Nope. The lesson from last week is to ignore the fickle ramblings of half our kiwi members. Funny how Conrad Smith hasn't been congratulated after this match..
For the million and second time, Savea had an asthma attack in South Africa. That was why he wasn't picked. There is a difference between having asthma and being unfit...
He was hardly terrible in either test. Quiet yes.
Biggest thing with Smith is the errors that are creeping in, 2-8 years ago the one back you could always rely on to be solid was Smith, in the last couple of years he has started to look human again, his average games seem to getting closer together.
We will have to agree to disagree on Conrad Smith. He had a great Super Rugby campaign, tackled at 90% - was probably the form center of the tournament. Against South Africa he had a quiet game. Not a big deal for the first international of the season, plenty of players looked very average against Samoa. It looks to me like his is still consistently making the right decisions, straightening the line and running hard or distributing at the right times. He has tackled at exactly 90% this year for the All Blacks. For the record Fekitoa is tackling at 58% for the All Blacks this year..
Fekitoa is been asked to pressure the ball carrier a lot more. Rush at the line. He does the same for the Highlanders.. Stats don't always tell a story, sometimes you have to watch players impact in the game, Fekitoa played a huge part in our South African victory.
I would have liked to have seen Ardie Savea on the team.
We will have to agree to disagree on Conrad Smith. He had a great Super Rugby campaign, tackled at 90% - was probably the form center of the tournament. Against South Africa he had a quiet game. Not a big deal for the first international of the season, plenty of players looked very average against Samoa. It looks to me like his is still consistently making the right decisions, straightening the line and running hard or distributing at the right times. He has tackled at exactly 90% this year for the All Blacks. For the record Fekitoa is tackling at 58% for the All Blacks this year..