I hate this argument. Apparently you cannot have an opinion on broader national policy without doing it yourself only. I think we should pay more towards the NHS, I don't think I alone should therefore donate more to the NHS but I would agree to it as part of a national policy.Peckham: Arrests after protesters thwart asylum seekers' coach transfer
Police and protesters clash over a planned bus transfer of asylum seekers from Peckham to Dorset.www.bbc.co.uk
Someone should ask this how many they'll personally take. Madness.
Then you're jumping to conclusions. We should do more, but acting like a child about it won't do anything.
I'm not jumping to any conclusions, you literally said "Someone should ask this how many they'll personally take" as if that's actually an argument. It isn't. It's an idiotic piece of rhetoric than falsely claims unless you are personally doing something you cannot support a position without being a hypocrite. It's nonsense.
Then you're wrong. There's loads they can do without resorting to throwing a temper tantrum because they can't get the toy they wanted. Grow up.
This has nothing to do with temper tantrum or the protests and everything to do with your stupid claim that you need to personally be doing something in order to support a position. I suggest you're the one that needs to grow up if you feel that is anything other than an absolutely idiotic point to make.
According to the beeb one of the chants was "No borders, no nations, stop deportations"
And I'm saying the whole "if you don't do it yourself, you can't hold a belief" is a bullshit argument, something you keep conveniently dodging. I agree they are being stupid, I disagree with pretending that they need to volunteer to take in asylum seekers themselves to not want deportations. These are 2 separate concepts.So you attack me, then agree then attack? You should probably step away from the keyboard and think before you start ranting...probably past your bedtime mind. If you don't like something, that's fine. I'm saying they're wrong. That's it.
Meanwhile
Politics latest: Keir Starmer under pressure over two-child benefit cap; senior Tory 'considering' leadership bid
Sir Keir Starmer launches new skills body as he faces questions over the two-child benefit cap. Meanwhile, Mel Stride says he is considering running to be Tory leader. Listen to Politics at Jack and Sam's as they discuss how Joe Biden's exit has upended the US election race.news.sky.com
Not dodging anything. If they want to help, do something to help. Support charities, push the legal case and believe it or not, you can help take some in if you wish. For some reason you've decided to focus purely on that comment and not the wider point of how mad it is. If you wish to continue, I'd suggest heading to your local playground for the level discussion you're capable of handling - because I'm done replying to someone talking out their behind because you don't agree with a comment.
I don't think this won't stop continue to amuse me. Man who bought in voter suppression get his vote suppressed.Suspect this might get a passing mention on tomorrow's HIGNFY.
Boris Johnson turned away from polling station after forgetting to bring photo ID
Former PM made the requirement to bring photo ID a stipulation of the Elections Act in 2022www.theguardian.com
Labour must know people are voting for them because they dislike the tories, right? I don't think I've actually heard anyone praise Labour for being inspirational etc.
I think most people want boring and a safe pair of hands after the last 8 years.
Blair (minus middle east), possibly Churchill but he was more a war leader his domestic record when actually elected was terrible.
