Or not, as the case may be![]()
Hill getting more minutes than he did seconds last game
The immediate part is supposed to represent the moment the ball carrier hits the ground before he can transfer it though...So every time you see a penalty awarded for 'not an immediate sack' it's wrong? Even watching it back frame-by-frame, I'm not seeing it.
No, I'm not seeing it.
Yes, I understand, I just don't agree that that was the timing.The immediate part is supposed to represent the moment the ball carrier hits the ground before he can transfer it though...
As the English player didn't transfer it, it was deemed a tackle. There's no time limit on a tackle!
And I agree with you, it was a successful maul IMHO, England have been penalised for being too successful and making too much ground too quick.Yes, I understand, I just don't agree that that was the timing.
Yep.And I agree with you, it was a successful maul IMHO, England have been penalised for being too successful and making too much ground too quick.
Freeman is brilliant but I don't see what Sleightholme offers above other English options?I think the pack has played well, and it's getting our back line out of jail as such. Some of our patterns are telegraphed and Italy are getting us behind the gain line.
Sleightholme butchered that with CCS out wide of him
FIFYPeople probably bored of hearing me.
AggroFreeman is brilliant but I don't see what Sleightholme offers above other English options?
Yeah, as a Saints fan I think he's great, But I would have Hassell Collins in over him when IFW isn't fitFreeman is brilliant but I don't see what Sleightholme offers above other English options?
No, you had 4 officials all agree it wasn't.Yep.
Everyone thinks it's a penalty try...