I haven't read anywhere that Ben has been totally discarded. Willis was left out of the match day squad last week and is playing this week.It gives me no confidence that Borthwick knows what he is doing that Ben Curry has been totally discarded after one game and we have a totally new centre partnership.
Agree, although I'm impressed that Borthwick is thinking of fireworks rather than closing out. The three you've listed will hopefully give us a new dimension as long as Smith is a direct swap for Farrell (ie Farrell doesn't revert to IC)Mitchell/Smith/Arundell comin vs tired legs could be fireworks
Bit of a glass cannon though - great if we wanna go balls to the wall, but not really a bench to close out a game
Yes there is no consistency to the selection. Its like he is picking the names out of a hat.I haven't read anywhere that Ben has been totally discarded. Willis was left out of the match day squad last week and is playing this week.
Yeah, it's ridiculous. As far as the changes go:Seems a tad early to be complaining about consistency of selection...
Curry didnt have a great game didnt deserve dropping but combined with the fact that arguably Willis is ahead of him, and with 3 days in camp he got left out of the 23 last week.It gives me no confidence that Borthwick knows what he is doing that Ben Curry has been totally discarded after one game and we have a totally new centre partnership.
Yes there is no consistency to the selection. Its like he is picking the names out of a hat.
Where have all these Ollie's suddenly sprung from? I've known 1 Ollie all my life and now there are 3 in the England squad.12. Ollie Lawrence
11. Ollie Hassell-Collins
5. Ollie Chessum
Ollie circles are only for the richest and hottest dudes. (I don't know a single Olie)Where have all these Ollie's suddenly sprung from? I've known 1 Ollie all my life and now there are 3 in the England squad.
I think you've missed my point, Curry hasn't been totally discarded. He could be back next week if SB thinks he suits the game plan better than Willis or Ludlam.Yes there is no consistency to the selection. Its like he is picking the names out of a hat.
Olly circles on the other hand....Ollie circles are only for the richest and hottest dudes
I've been making them in a lab in my garden shedWhere have all these Ollie's suddenly sprung from? I've known 1 Ollie all my life and now there are 3 in the England squad.
He could but I don't think thats a good way to manage a player. If you are going to select someone you should give them a consistent run of games.I think you've missed my point, Curry hasn't been totally discarded. He could be back next week if SB thinks he suits the game plan better than Willis or Ludlam.
This is the issue for me … being captain doesn't mean Farrell has to play the full 80 but I have a horrible feeling he will.Agree, although I'm impressed that Borthwick is thinking of fireworks rather than closing out. The three you've listed will hopefully give us a new dimension as long as Smith is a direct swap for Farrell (ie Farrell doesn't revert to IC)
Guessing you're a bit older than them?Where have all these Ollie's suddenly sprung from? I've known 1 Ollie all my life and now there are 3 in the England squad.
Vice captain being someone who will play 60-70mins, tops, definitely leans that wayThis is the issue for me … being captain doesn't mean Farrell has to play the full 80 but I have a horrible feeling he will.
We don't know what conversations have been had. It's only bad management if the communication has been poor.He could but I don't think thats a good way to manage a player. If you are going to select someone you should give them a consistent run of games.