- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
- Messages
- 100,019,970
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Bloody hell I forgot to Barbeary existed, he's not played since rd.2
Last edited:
I really liked Morgan, he was much more of my kind of 8 compared to Billy who I've never warmed to an Morgan seemed to be dropped for Billy even when he was playing better albeit I'm not sure his form has been great this whole time.Yep.
Time's moved on but I always thought Morgan was discarded way too soon. Same age as Lawes and Youngs.
And the Barbeary enigma. Looking at the way we've been scrabbling around for hookers and with George's age / LCD's emigration he wouldn't be human if he hadn't occasionally thought 'what if'.
Current Billy belongs no where near international, however how he could in his prime have been anything but near on the perfect 8 is beyond me, he would make yards whilst being double and triple teamed, remember for Sarries was often the difference in tight games at the latter stages of the European ***les, he is now the past but let's not pretend he wasn't once genuine world class.I really liked Morgan, he was much more of my kind of 8 compared to Billy who I've never warmed to an Morgan seemed to be dropped for Billy even when he was playing better albeit I'm not sure his form has been great this whole time.
I'd have always preferred a more mobile and intelligent Read type 8 to a Billy one (which I know is personal preference). But even in his prime he wasn't an intelligent player and you did always lose something in the backrow but then I guess you gained a lump of a carrier.Current Billy belongs no where near international, however how he could in his prime have been anything but near on the perfect 8 is beyond me, he would make yards whilst being double and triple teamed, remember for Sarries was often the difference in tight games at the latter stages of the European ***les, he is now the past but let's not pretend he wasn't once genuine world class.
I agree on personal preferences but your pick will be based on many variables, pool of players style of play etc, it's not logical to simply say I want an intelligent running 8 then have a really small mobile 6 and 7 which lacks any carrying ability, I think you are doing BV a bit of a disservice here, I am not pretending he was the most intelligent 8 ever seen but he did run decoy lines and was pretty good offloading and link play especially with Mako, carrying into traffic he excelled at but that doesn't mean it was the single component of his game, The player he was and now is are not the same thing, based on current stock SB need to utilise someone more dynamic than a brute, when available Mercer is the obvious candidate until then Dombrandt is probably the answer, at-least with these two selections the expectations of the way they play is not hugely different and doesn't require changing other personnel to maintain balance.I'd have always preferred a more mobile and intelligent Read type 8 to a Billy one (which I know is personal preference). But even in his prime he wasn't an intelligent player and you did always lose something in the backrow but then I guess you gained a lump of a carrier.
Jinxed it again!England by 30
James Forrester was another Glaws what might have been 8.I'd have always preferred a more mobile and intelligent Read type 8 to a Billy one (which I know is personal preference). But even in his prime he wasn't an intelligent player and you did always lose something in the backrow but then I guess you gained a lump of a carrier.
Talking about Morgan, we also had Narraway who was discarded early as well. Coincidence that they both played for Gloucester?
I wonder if there is any truth or massive coincidence that Gloucester players just don't get called up to England as much. Probably just coincidence but they've had some brilliant backs that don't get a look in for years gone by.James Forrester was another Glaws what might have been 8.
I will accept a win, even if it's uncontrolled and the opposite of dominantEngland really need to put a marker down in this game.
Anything but a controlled dominant win will not be good enough.
There were definitely periods where certain teams were heavily favoured and players from other clubs struggled to get a look in, even if they were individually good. Irish, Newcastle and Sale could have all said similar to Gloucester over the years though. I don't think that's been the case in recent years. There's plenty to dislike about Eddie Jones, but he didn't have a club bias.I wonder if there is any truth or massive coincidence that Gloucester players just don't get called up to England as much. Probably just coincidence but they've had some brilliant backs that don't get a look in for years gone by.
Interestingly in a recent interview Radwan has confirmed Jones told him he must improve his high ball defence, and general defence.Players like Simpson-Daniel were a bit like Radwan is today but also with the added element of being very injury prone.
I remember James Forrester as well. He had real pace.I'd have always preferred a more mobile and intelligent Read type 8 to a Billy one (which I know is personal preference). But even in his prime he wasn't an intelligent player and you did always lose something in the backrow but then I guess you gained a lump of a carrier.
Talking about Morgan, we also had Narraway who was discarded early as well. Coincidence that they both played for Gloucester?
Been so many.I remember James Forrester as well. He had real pace.
Thank god you clarified that, your username was throwing me right off.Interestingly in a recent interview Radwan has confirmed Jones told him he must improve his high ball defence, and general defence.
I've got faith in what Walder and Mark Wilson are doing here (FALCONS) now so hopefully Mark can sort that aspect of his game out.
Did he even know which teams the players came from?There's plenty to dislike about Eddie Jones, but he didn't have a club bias.