- Joined
- Nov 5, 2017
- Messages
- 3,537
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Thanks.Think it's POM/Holland. Used to be D.Ryan.
Thanks.Think it's POM/Holland. Used to be D.Ryan.
Ok, I have to disagree. We'll more than likely play SA in the QF and we should expect to beat them with a reasonably full strength side.
OkI agree, but I'll bet you thought that in 2015 with Argentina as well.
Ok
That wasn't a reasonably full strength side though.
The thing in this is next time we wont be at full strength either. The trick is being prepared. I think Schmidt failed miserably at the last RWC. And he knows it with selections and tactics. But the difference he has learnt now. That RWC has triggered him to leave no stone unturned. He sent Joey to us as Joey wanted to be a 10 and we could offer him to be key 10. It meant if Sextob goes down Joe has 2 serious options in Byrne and especially Joey who is playing as a starter in top european games. Same at 9. Murray goes down it's not end of world.Ok
That wasn't a reasonably full strength side though.
Fair enough. So all things being equal on current squads and fitness I would expect you to get over SA, but it would be bloody tough. They have the same abrasive style as you guys. You wouldn't get out of that unscathed. But, I think what most people are pointing out, 12 months is a looooong time away in Rugby months. Any number of injuries or fitness issues could happen. And if you want a largely first choice team, well good luck.
I still remember the 2011 WC where Carter hurt his groin in training and tournament over. We needed our 4th string 10 to come on. Beaver had been out fishing when he got the call up, as the legend goes.
The point being, you were great on saturday, at full strength, you can anyone a run for their money and legitimately believe you will get the W. But don't get too far ahead and beware of pride coming before a fall. From a long time AB fan, it is actually harder being on top as the expectation is always there and you are in everyone's crosshairs. Good luck.
Are we getting ahead of ourselves? Is anyone saying we're guaranteed to win? People are just very confident which as the number two ranked side in the world we're pretty entitled to be. We know twelve months is a long time but we're also allowed enjoy a good run and be confident in it being maintained for at least a while provided something catastrophic doesn't happen. We have the strongest depth we've ever had, we just beat New Zealand without Murray which would have been unthinkable not so long ago. Sure if we lose 5 starters of the highest quality in one week we'll be in a weaker position but it won't be as bad as 2015. We've improved which is really all we can ask for.
I feel like if it was England, South Africa or Australia in a similar position people wouldn't be saying this. It's almost as if since we were the underdog for so long and different sides to this one have failed we're not allowed to have some pride in our team. Also frankly it doesn't matter what I or any fan feel. We could think we'll be handed the world cup or that we won't have a single win. What we believe doesn't matter.
Are we getting ahead of ourselves?
Failed miserably is a ridiculous statement, he only had half a cycle to prepare for that RWC. He sent the most prepared team we have ever sent to an RWC and got ridiculously unlucky with injuries. There were a few oversights sure but that QF loss was mostly Joe losing a battle against time to build depth.The thing in this is next time we wont be at full strength either. The trick is being prepared. I think Schmidt failed miserably at the last RWC. And he knows it with selections and tactics. But the difference he has learnt now. That RWC has triggered him to leave no stone unturned. He sent Joey to us as Joey wanted to be a 10 and we could offer him to be key 10. It meant if Sextob goes down Joe has 2 serious options in Byrne and especially Joey who is playing as a starter in top european games. Same at 9. Murray goes down it's not end of world.
Schmidt learnt from last RWC that you need to build a large pool. And while it frustrated me at times he has built a squad of 40 who really are all capable.
Yes it was a failure. No 2 ways about it. That Irish team was not picked right in my eyes. And had no depth developed. The Madigan situation being the biggest issue. Agreed Schmidt only had half a cycle and not enough time to develop depth. But as you said the greatest prepared team who achived no better than 2011 or other years gone past. Yes there was injuries but still a failure ultimately. Not 100% on Schmidt but he has learnt. Madigan situation being 1. He has made sure his back up is playing regularly at top level as a 10.Failed miserably is a ridiculous statement, he only had half a cycle to prepare for that RWC. He sent the most prepared team we have ever sent to an RWC and got ridiculously unlucky with injuries. There were a few oversights sure but that QF loss was mostly Joe losing a battle against time to build depth.
Yes we are*.
We lean far too heavily on our forwards to dominate opponents for us to win.
Even if the AB forward unit doesn't get parity - like Saturday - their threat out the back means they can still win a game they've not really earned the right to.
We are far too blunt for that. We don't have a 12 who can act as a 2nd pivot with a range of passing/kicking and our full back doesn't carry the same running threat.
They are the best of what we have - but its not at NZ level yet. Not a criticism of the players - just a realistic observation of what they can and cannot do.
*in respect of the meeja making us out as this existential threat to NZ in Japan. We are on a good day if they aren't on their game. Obviously, not getting beyond a QF would be viewed as a disaster of 2007 proportions at this point in time.
You said Schmidt failed miserably the first time, that's ridiculously unfair on a guy who didn't have a full cycle to prepare. This time you've reverted to Schmidt was not fully to blame which is fairer but still a bit much considering it infers most the blame on him. The IRFU were more to blame in my opinion, we'd had 12 years with two coaches who weren't world class before Joe's arrival and that's why he had to take shortcuts building depth.Yes it was a failure. No 2 ways about it. That Irish team was not picked right in my eyes. And had no depth developed. The Madigan situation being the biggest issue. Agreed Schmidt only had half a cycle and not enough time to develop depth. But as you said the greatest prepared team who achived no better than 2011 or other years gone past. Yes there was injuries but still a failure ultimately. Not 100% on Schmidt but he has learnt. Madigan situation being 1. He has made sure his back up is playing regularly at top level as a 10.
2015 cant be blamed on injuries. Every team will get that. Look at NZ in 2011. It's adapting to them that seperated the best from the rest.
But ultimately Ireland failed miserably on their targets at that RWC. Again not fully Schmidts fault. But as a whole they failed.
But as I said on Schmidt he learnt from it and what makes him good is he knows what to correct and has corrected it
Henshaw is criminally underrated too. As good as Aki was the last two weeks Henshaw basically brings everything we saw with strong passing and kicking as well as a better ability to read the game on both sides of the ball. It's really unfortunate that him and Ringrose have only played twice together in green.
sfunny that nz press is calling for kRead and hansen to be dropped after that loss.
talk about chucking the baby out with the bath water
looks like a leprechaun to me, a magical one though I guess.All hail our mighty wizard president.
the props were impressive around the park tooPeter O'Mahony has shown why he's 1 of best 6s around. Vital for us. Van Der Flier flying it too and Stander having huge game too. Ryan and Toner too playing well. Our back 5 of pack really setting tone.
Oh but they do but they wait. Lers not forget Andy Farrell record against NZ is pretty good.
Lers not forget Andy Farrell record against NZ is pretty good.
next captain?Peter O'Mahony has been immense.
yeah, except it has been quite usual this year. i'm hoping they haven't lost that aspect from their culture.NZ unusually rushing things and making a lot of incorrect decisions. Massively unusual to them and credit to the pressure Ireland have put them under.
Still could go either way.
good luck next time england.Yeehaa!!
Sweet of you to say soThe NZ'ers deserve huge credit for their effort in the last 20. .
Based on that game savea would have made your 23. He and ALB the only ones though.Our back row played them off the pitch. Savea, Squire and Barrett wouldn't make our 23.
reek, beaten, damian, ALB... give the defence some credit, and recognise that playmaking is more important for line breaks than the line breaking player himself. it was very similar to 2003 WC semifinal that game, in both of those respects.We lack line breakers more than anything these days, who from our team would you call a line breaker?
ahh, there we go, the answer to a question i posted after this answer had been posted....say that ten times fast.Easily. A top coach.
ummm.......................................................................................Just for NZ fans. What was the story with selection these last few months ye seem unsure who to play where