not sure if this a thread for it but i agree. rebels bring nothing to the table.If you are arguing markets then its the Rebels that must be cut.
not sure if this a thread for it but i agree. rebels bring nothing to the table.
i hear b!tchin about sWolves and jaguares and how they should be dropped, but those 2 teams aren't the ones embarrassing themselves and are winning more games than the neo-aus teams when they were introduced.
sWolves have claimed some good scalps. jaguares were at the top of their conf earlier this year before the wheels fell off their campaign.
i gotta stand up for the average kiwi here.Compare that with NZ and especially Aussie crowds, who can tend to be a bit fairweather and fickle
i gotta stand up for the average kiwi here.
i have one kid that plays rugby, after at least 2 trainings a week and then rugby all saturday and probably sunday , on top of that theres rep trainings and games to get to, come super games i'm totally rugby'd out and just wanna sit my a55 down in the evening and relax. (note my boy also does swimming, competitive gymnastics, tennis, golf and surflifesaving )
also most kiwi's would rather play rugby than watch it.
unfortunately that means lack of crowds.
fortunately this means that grassroots is strong.
NZ will never have the crowd turn out that the saffa's have but then again no country will have the grassroots that NZ has.
i cant speak for you cookie or for the tasman area. but in wellington at any given game i see hundreds of volunteers, giving. like you the majority of these are females, predominantly mothers. and that just one game that i am at. i'm sure for all the 100 other games thru out wellington and kapiti its the same.Yep, but a significant majority of rugby match attendees are just the public, they don't have kids plying at don't play themselves.