- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 20,521
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
There's so many more factors in winning the tournament than the game against Italy, a lot of which is just dumb luck. Having Italy or a home game first up, having two of England, France and Wales at home and not losing by a big score if you do lose are all bigger factors to the final standing. On any given year, if you don't win the grandslam but beat a side with the same amount of w's on PD its hard to say you are deserving winners, Ireland's last two championship wins were over sides with the same amount of wins who had beaten them head to head, it was only due to winning the thing twice in a row that we could fairly say we're the best in Europe.Look I'm not questioning Italy's right to do the tactic or England's complete inability to play well against it. That's a different argument.
I'm just asking if the tournament does get decided on PD is it right that one team looses because they had a one-off tactic (as in it won't work against other teams as they'll be ready for it) deployed against them? Would Scottish fans be happy? Would Irish? I know the Welsh would be even more vocal if this had happened against them and still claiming the players were offside.
If we win our next to games and take it on PD or BP's (An equally trivial deciding factor) it wouldn't be reasonable to say we're the best side in Europe, England would have lost one of 10 games in the last two years whereas we'll have shipped three losses and a draw in the tournament, getting the trophy would just be a case of timing and luck like any other no slam year... Throwing away a slam in Murrayfield like 2001 would be a **** pill to swallow if we do go well over the next three weeks... (I'd really like a triple crown next year, its been a while after sharing it with Wales in the 2000's!)