Those last phases of play demonstrate to me what separates teams like South Africa and New Zealand from the rest of the world, they would of clinically put that game away. France will be killing themselves they didn't win that.
It would have been a penalty if the stupid Frenchman hadn't picked the ball up.
who got man off the match ?
Hilarious. So you don't think rugby tackling someone in normal life are any type of clearout wouldn't see you getting charged.
That path of argument in regards rugby no matter who uses it are which incident you use it. If I tried to use it for 2005 I'd be stupid.
Ireland undeserving winners, ref did a great job (for them). Hope Healey gets a very long ban.
Stupid comment, the fouls is or not, if it is whatever the guy takes the ball or not is irrelevant...
rob kearney??!
Yes it is... If that scrum kept driving rather than the no.8 picking up then the Irish would have been pinged for bringing the scrum down or any number of scrum related penalties.
Irish forwards were down, the scrum had already collapsed : penalty should have been whistled, whatever the french did.
Ireland undeserving winners, ref did a great job (for them). Hope Healey gets a very long ban.
Intent does factor into criminal law you know... the intent in a rugby tackle isn't actually to hurt someone, but Healey's attack was something clearly done maliciously and with intent to hurt. And he's got a pretty bad track record when it comes to malicious play.
Irish forwards were down, the scrum had already collapsed : penalty should have been whistled, whatever the french did.
What a poor comment ! in the final of the last RWC, NZ has never put the game away, they have been Lucky Joubert hadn't the balls to whistle the so numerous fouls the ABs did...
The superiority of the ABs is more in the franchise system which advantage the national side, give lots of time to prepare and the fact their players did twice less match than any NH players.