• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

A Political Thread pt. 2

It's so nice not hearing Trump's irritating voice blather on and on into microphones like he did everyday for the past 4 years. I feel like I've been released from sensory prison. :)
 
Witness to be called at the Senate trial. Probably won’t change the result of conviction but still delays things and about a phone call Trump had with McCarthy during the riot.
Only thing that could change it is if there is a huge shift in public opinion and senators feel they need to go with the public mood.
 
Only thing that could change it is if there is a huge shift in public opinion and senators feel they need to go with the public mood.

True. Still all of it should be heard. Now whether once the conviction fails a second vote to disqualify him from public office can be held is what I am interested in. And then only a simple majority would be needed.
 
The hope would be , GOP would not want him in 4 yrs.
As always with US just convicte on minor tax issues to disbare him from office.
 
Ex-Convicts aren't barred from office (though they are often barred from voting...)
Technically I'm not even sure current convicts are barred as the Constitution doesn't say this. I really wouldn't put it past the Republicans or their voters at this stage to actually vote in Trump even if he was in a jail cell.

Now that would be one hell of a Constitutional crisis to sort out.

Also: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/13/mitch-mcconnell-trump-republicans

McConnell and the Republicans really are such a bunch of lying, 2 faced hypocritical *****. This is full on Orwellian double speak and now they are blaming Antifa and Pelosi for the storming of the capitol! They are ******* insane...
 

Government trying to promote "free speech" on uni campuses.

Whilst I agree with the idea that free speech and exchange of ideas should be protected, I don't think they have thought this through. Simple ways around this would be things like simply not inviting speakers who hold certain views, students not turning up to talks by these speakers if they do and a bunch of other actions people can take in exercising their free speech.

It's like the right wing complaining about cancel culture in the USA after ignoring the fact that they actually promoted it in the first place. They frequently threatened to boycott companies for not doing what they wanted and said if you disagree with what a company does, don't buy their products. That's exactly what people did to influence company behaviour and now they are whinging that companies are reacting to people refusing to buy their products and calling it cancel culture.

As far as I can see, this will be unenforceable and will result in people with extreme views demanding to be heard at Unis and demanding their talks be fully attended or else their free speech is being infringed.
 

Latest posts

Sponsored
UnlistMe
Back
Top