• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Wales v South Africa - 23/11/2024 (17.40)

Wales now at 22/1. The Hanekom debut is salt in the wounds. Don't know why he has chosen the Boks over Cymru :-(
 
Gatland confirmed there is no release clause in his contract that kicks in after the 6N or any clause at all.

You couldn't make this **** up.

That, along with the fact he seems defiant now and saying he's not resigning this is a big problem. I'd still like to see Gatland moved upstairs. ****, as this point I'd be over the moon if we sacked Nigel Walker and replaced him with Gats. I think Gats' ego would get in the way, though.

Maybe it's all bluster on Gatlands part and he's just playing some mind games with the WRU. You'd think 50 odd thousand turning up to watch another 50 plus point loss will surely force their hand, though. Break clause or no break clause.
 
You Welsh lot seriously need to stop 1 upping us. How are you in a bigger mess replacing your HC than us? WRU have ****** up big time.
 
Reiser99 said:
You Welsh lot seriously need to stop 1 upping us. How are you in a bigger mess replacing your HC than us? WRU have ****** up big time.
Click to expand...
To be fair it's been coming for a while. Getting to this point was clearly avoidable but the general malaise of Welsh rugby less so.
 
So it has already been confirmed that PSdT won't be playing. In addition to that Ox Nche has been spared as he isn't 100%. Updated SA team:

South Africa: 15 Aphelele Fassi, 14 Cheslin Kolbe, 13 Jesse Kriel, 12 Damian de Allende, 11 Kurt-Lee Arendse, 10 Jordan Hendrikse, 9 Jaden Hendrikse, 8 Jasper Wiese, 7 Elrigh Louw, 6 Siya Kolisi (c), 5 Franco Mostert, 4 Jean Kleyn, 3 Wilco Louw, 2 Johan Grobbelaar, 1 Thomas du Toit
Replacements: 16 Malcolm Marx, 17 Gerhard Steenekamp, 18 Vincent Koch, 19 Eben Etzebeth, 20 RG Snyman, 21 Cameron Hanekom, 22 Cobus Reinach, 23 Handre Pollard

Its crazy to hear that we will have fielded a total of 52 different players this year but I've had an argument with my brother in law that we aren't as deep in quality everywhere. To some extent utility players make up for it but to some degree its more a case of we have fielded a few pedestrian players and/or though our 4th choice is not a huge drop off from the 1st its more a case of our 1st choice not being a worldie.
 
Last edited:
Welsh Exile said:
Gatland confirmed there is no release clause in his contract that kicks in after the 6N or any clause at all.

You couldn't make this **** up.

That, along with the fact he seems defiant now and saying he's not resigning this is a big problem. I'd still like to see Gatland moved upstairs. ****, as this point I'd be over the moon if we sacked Nigel Walker and replaced him with Gats. I think Gats' ego would get in the way, though.

Maybe it's all bluster on Gatlands part and he's just playing some mind games with the WRU. You'd think 50 odd thousand turning up to watch another 50 plus point loss will surely force their hand, though. Break clause or no break clause.
Click to expand...
Gats had the WRU by the short hairs after they fired Pivac. He leveraged the England offer to get a boatload of cash.

Even if the WRU fires him, do they have the $$ to go get a respected coach? I doubt it. It's Gats or some no name with minimal international experience.
 
ChicagoKid said:
Gats had the WRU by the short hairs after they fired Pivac. He leveraged the England offer to get a boatload of cash.

Even if the WRU fires him, do they have the $$ to go get a respected coach? I doubt it. It's Gats or some no name with minimal international experience.
Click to expand...
The short answer to this is yes of course they do. Whilst it will be expensive the WRU have the financial ability to release him and pay someone at that level. The harder question is who might want to take the job given the obvious systemic issues at most levels.
 
Bluemoon said:
The short answer to this is yes of course they do. Whilst it will be expensive the WRU have the financial ability to release him and pay someone at that level. The harder question is who might want to take the job given the obvious systemic issues at most levels.
Click to expand...
The RFU and England are doing ok with coaches with no international experience............................
 
Bluemoon said:
The short answer to this is yes of course they do. Whilst it will be expensive the WRU have the financial ability to release him and pay someone at that level. The harder question is who might want to take the job given the obvious systemic issues at most levels.
Click to expand...
Money talks. If we're offering Gatland money (£600k pa) you'll have people queuing up.

Bar your Farrells and what not.

I actually think if we have to pay out Gatlands contract then it's a big ask that we then have to pay out someone else's contract so I think we'll be looking for people out of contract but this is all guesswork.
 
Welsh Exile said:
Money talks. If we're offering Gatland money (£600k pa) you'll have people queuing up.

Bar your Farrells and what not.

I actually think if we have to pay out Gatlands contract then it's a big ask that we then have to pay out someone else's contract so I think we'll be looking for people out of contract but this is all guesswork.
Click to expand...
I swear I'm not trying to be dense here, but is £600k really an astronomical sum? I've heard this figure repeated ad nauseum and honestly, it's not that much money to me considering the importance of the role.

For example, Kolbe was on a £1m in France and he's a winger. A top-tier coach should at least be making what the top-paid winger is making.

I find it bizarre that a top lawyer, doctor, engineer here makes more than head coach of a £100m organization.
 
ChicagoKid said:
I swear I'm not trying to be dense here, but is £600k really an astronomical sum? I've heard this figure repeated ad nauseum and honestly, it's not that much money to me considering the importance of the role.

For example, Kolbe was on a £1m in France and he's a winger. A top-tier coach should at least be making what the top-paid winger is making.

I find it bizarre that a top lawyer, doctor, engineer here makes more than head coach of a £100m organization.
Click to expand...
In Rugby it makes him one the highest paid coaches in the world. I think, for a time, he was the highest paid international coach at least.

A lot of doctors and lawyers aren't on £600k pa either. I know you said "top" and you're probably right, the best doctors/lawyers etc are on more than that but the bulk of those professions aren't on that kind of money.
 
ChicagoKid said:
I swear I'm not trying to be dense here, but is £600k really an astronomical sum? I've heard this figure repeated ad nauseum and honestly, it's not that much money to me considering the importance of the role.

For example, Kolbe was on a £1m in France and he's a winger. A top-tier coach should at least be making what the top-paid winger is making.

I find it bizarre that a top lawyer, doctor, engineer here makes more than head coach of a £100m organization.
Click to expand...
Then if you were to expand to another sport for example football, Southgate is on £5 mill versus Kane on £20+ million.

I don't think you can tie a player's compensation to a coach's compensation.
 
AlRums said:
Then if you were to expand to another sport for example football, Southgate is on £5 mill versus Kane on £20+ million.

I don't think you can tie a player's compensation to a coach's compensation.
Click to expand...
That's shockingly low. I would expect the England Soccer coach to be on at least $15 million.
 
Welsh Exile said:
Money talks. If we're offering Gatland money (£600k pa) you'll have people queuing up.

Bar your Farrells and what not.

I actually think if we have to pay out Gatlands contract then it's a big ask that we then have to pay out someone else's contract so I think we'll be looking for people out of contract but this is all guesswork.
Click to expand...
I get your point, but Im not sure it'd be good for anyone at the top of their career, or about to get a break to come here as the risk is massive.

I get the sense we'd be more likely to be targeting someone on the way up rather than someone currently at the top. Might end up being a bit like 00's Italy for a while.

I wondered if Dai Young might be a quiet outside bet. Someone who has links to the clubs etc.
 
Bluemoon said:
I get your point, but Im not sure it'd be good for anyone at the top of their career, or about to get a break to come here as the risk is massive.

I get the sense we'd be more likely to be targeting someone on the way up rather than someone currently at the top. Might end up being a bit like 00's Italy for a while.

I wondered if Dai Young might be a quiet outside bet. Someone who has links to the clubs etc.
Click to expand...
I'd put Dai Young in the Tandy category to be honest. A bit uninspiring but I agree that we may target an up and comer like a ROG (though he would be expensive)

I still think Jospeh makes great sense. Roughly same age as Gatland 10 years ago when he was good, great experience, plays good rugby, used to dealing with a squad without great front 5 players, makes teams competitive and would be relatively cheap.
 

Similar threads

O
England v South Africa - 16/11/2024 (17.40)
27 28 29
Replies
565
Views
15K
TRF_Olyy
TRF_Olyy
O
Ireland v Fiji - 23/11/2024 (15.10)
6 7 8
Replies
144
Views
3K
ShropshireAllBlack
ShropshireAllBlack
O
Wales v Australia - 17/11/2024 (16.10)
7 8 9
Replies
168
Views
5K
AlRums
AlRums
O
Italy v New Zealand - 23/11/2024 (20.10)
3 4 5
Replies
89
Views
2K
miccloarch
miccloarch
AlRums
Scotland v South Africa - 10 Nov 2024 - 16:10
4 5 6
Replies
112
Views
3K
TRF_stormer2010
TRF_stormer2010

Latest posts

Top