I watched those videos very closely. Rewinding a few bits here and there, I'm certainly getting the hunger back.
I must agree that Danny could not be judged by that one game, in a final of anything, it's always possible for someone to be unnerved or a little bit too focused on their strong areas of the game.
The key to (and beauty of) this game is presenting options. You must present to your opposition the appearance that you have as many options available as possible. this creates uncertainty. In the split second before you take your preferred option you must present your decoy option. If they don't buy it, then you actually DO USE the decoy option. It sounds complex, but it's actually a subtlety of the game.
Your head really has to be comfortable in three places, 1 - the decisive present time, 2 - the potential future (1-2 seconds ahead), 3 - Crisp execution.
It's possible, that's those moments of brilliance that we sometimes see. More often than not though, many of us can only do two of those at a time. Gay-Guy, seems to be able to do those three things at most times.
What stops people keeping those three areas of thinking in sync with each other? Pressure, verbal mind games, tight defence (it gets inside your head) and over-confidence!
I watched every thing I could find online, even the presentation. I felt, and this is going to sound dumb, but I felt like I was South Africa watching the 1987 World Cup on tv.
I felt hungry, left out, under-rated, admiration of what I saw and a big chip on my shoulder with a point to prove.
I was there long enough to know it was going to be good, with first class hosts how could it not be? I never realised though how much un-finished business I have.
I've got a lot of work to do.