• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

The Lions squad for 2021 prediction

Duhan van der Merwe is as much Scottish, as CJ Stander is Irish, or Mouritz Botha is English
I have more time for those two because at least they stuck around after gaining eligibility - I believe CJ Stander is an Irish citizen now, and I'm pretty sure Botha is a British citizen now, as he still lives in England after retiring

DvdM cleared out of Scotland as soon as he was able, and I imagine once his Worcester contract is up he'll clear off to France or Japan
 
I have more time for those two because at least they stuck around after gaining eligibility - I believe CJ Stander is an Irish citizen now, and I'm pretty sure Botha is a British citizen now, as he still lives in England after retiring

DvdM cleared out of Scotland as soon as he was able, and I imagine once his Worcester contract is up he'll clear off to France or Japan
They are all South African mercenaries for hire...

I can add a few more... Brad Barrit, Richardt Strauss, Quinn Roux, Pierre Schoeman, WP Nel...

To pick a player based on the residency rule for their country, is one thing. To pick them for the British & Irish Lions is a different issue altogether, and to me, players who play tests based on residency, shouldn't be elible to be picked for the Lions...
 
They are all South African mercenaries for hire...

I can add a few more... Brad Barrit, Richardt Strauss, Quinn Roux, Pierre Schoeman, WP Nel...

To pick a player based on the residency rule for their country, is one thing. To pick them for the British & Irish Lions is a different issue altogether, and to me, players who play tests based on residency, shouldn't be elible to be picked for the Lions...

Playing Devils advocate, why would it be ok to play for say England under residency rule but not the lions?
 
Playing Devils advocate, why would it be ok to play for say England under residency rule but not the lions?
The B&I Lions, is a gathering of the 4 home nations (as they used to call them, before some Irish poster starts to attack me). Surely there must be some bit of pride left in the Lions to pick 39-50 players who are born and bred local talent???

Otherwise, this is just going to become a glorified barbarians team, that tours...
 
I can understand the logic, but I don't necessarily agree with it

I have my own feelings about pro players moving and becoming eligible, but WR would never sign off on different eligibility rules for one series and not the game in general
 
They are all South African mercenaries for hire...

I can add a few more... Brad Barrit, Richardt Strauss, Quinn Roux, Pierre Schoeman, WP Nel...

To pick a player based on the residency rule for their country, is one thing. To pick them for the British & Irish Lions is a different issue altogether, and to me, players who play tests based on residency, shouldn't be elible to be picked for the Lions...
Watch your mouth, it's Quinn Poo to you.
 
The B&I Lions, is a gathering of the 4 home nations (as they used to call them, before some Irish poster starts to attack me). Surely there must be some bit of pride left in the Lions to pick 39-50 players who are born and bred local talent???

Otherwise, this is just going to become a glorified barbarians team, that tours...
I don't think you can have 1 rule for 1 and another for someone else. It's got to be consistent.

So would you say everyone in the lions has to be born in the UK and/or Ireland or is it ok if they moved here as a kid, if so how long or old would they have to be until it's ok.
 
The B&I Lions, is a gathering of the 4 home nations (as they used to call them, before some Irish poster starts to attack me). Surely there must be some bit of pride left in the Lions to pick 39-50 players who are born and bred local talent???

Otherwise, this is just going to become a glorified barbarians team, that tours...
Born and bred? Sorry but you need to take into account the level of immigration into Britain and Ireland, stopping someone from representing a rugby team on the basis of "your not born here mate" is somewhat racist and rightly open to legal challenge. Yes the residency rules around international selection have been abused by all the nations involved in the Lions but if you qualify for England, Ireland, Scotland or Wales then you quality for the Lions. Its not perfect but then nothing in life is.
 
I don't think you can have 1 rule for 1 and another for someone else. It's got to be consistent.

So would you say everyone in the lions has to be born in the UK and/or Ireland or is it ok if they moved here as a kid, if so how long or old would they have to be until it's ok.
I did say born and bred? So age group players is also OK.

But why must it there be a correlation between the B&I Lions and any other test team? It's not like the B&I Lions play tests every year, can play in the World Cup?

I think the B&I Lions should be regarded as a higher honour than to play for your country...
 
I did say born and bred? So age group players is also OK.

But why must it there be a correlation between the B&I Lions and any other test team? It's not like the B&I Lions play tests every year, can play in the World Cup?

I think the B&I Lions should be regarded as a higher honour than to play for your country...
I can see where you're coming from but to me the lions should be no different to any other international team in that if you qualify through residency then fine. Now naturally we can have a separate debate about what the residency rules should be and I think a lot would agree 3 years isn't long enough but it is what it is I suppose. I think we're more or less on the same page anyway. If you've been here for several years, especially as a kid under 18 then all good.
 
I understand the logic.
It's sad seeing "mercenaries" play for something that's meant to "mean" so much, but that's a point that has been argued about International rugby for years now

Although it made me giggle seeing Worcester claim DVDM as their 2nd ever Worcester Lion despite him not even training with wuss before the tour starts.

https://warriors.co.uk/2021/05/06/duhan-van-der-merwe-named-in-british-and-irish-lions-squad/


"Scotland wing Duhan van der Merwe will become Warriors' second British and Irish Lion following his inclusion in Warren Gatland's 37-man squad for this summer's tour of South Africa.

Although van der Merwe will still be an Edinburgh player when the tour begins, his contract with Warriors begins on July 1, two days before the Lions face the DHL Stormers in their opening match in Cape Town."

"It is terrific to see that Duhan has made the Lions squad," said Warriors Director of Rugby Alan Solomons.
"It's great news for Duhan and also for Worcester Warriors. All of us here at Sixways are chuffed to bits at having a Warrior selected for the Lions."
 
I can see where you're coming from but to me the lions should be no different to any other international team in that if you qualify through residency then fine. Now naturally we can have a separate debate about what the residency rules should be and I think a lot would agree 3 years isn't long enough but it is what it is I suppose. I think we're more or less on the same page anyway. If you've been here for several years, especially as a kid under 18 then all good.
Fine, then might as well end the traditions of the B&I Lions now, get teams like Scotland to get more project players into their national squads, and by 2050 or so, none of the B&I Lions players are actually from England, Wales, Scotland or Ireland. Call them the global barbarians, and have them tour every 4 years to any of the top 10 teams on the rankings...
 
Fine, then might as well end the traditions of the B&I Lions now, get teams like Scotland to get more project players into their national squads, and by 2050 or so, none of the B&I Lions players are actually from England, Wales, Scotland or Ireland. Call them the global barbarians, and have them tour every 4 years to any of the top 10 teams on the rankings...
I don't see how you got that from my post. I don't think 3 years is long enough and you yourself have said if someone has moved somewhere as a kid then that is fine. So you're obviously ok with the residency rule to some degree just not as it is in its current format. If Stander or Van de Merwe had moved here as 15 year olds, say, then I don't think you'd have to much problem if 10 years later they were selcted for the Lions. That's all I'm saying, I'm not saying have some fee for all where anyone can come over and claim whatever nationality they like. I've always thought 5 years is fine but wouldn't have any problem if they raised it to 7 years.

If say some 15 year old kid from some other country in Africa moved to SA would you be angry if he played for SA 5 or so years later?
 
Yeh but the point is they didn't move at 15.

Heineken seems to be talking about project signings which are older players usually 20+
 
eopen to legal challenge
Pretty sure if someone is eligible for any of B&I Lions countries who was not selected on these ground due to an actual policy would have a field day. Not only would the legal battle be expensive but they'd also have took out things like potential future earnings. If it were found out Gatland and his team had any discussion along these lines and then didn't select VDM they'd also be opening themselves up for litigation.

There's an entirely difference discussion about if VDM should be selected on talent.

The problem is with international eligibility levels and those have to apply to B&I Lions like any other national team unless you want tons of litgation costing the sport and tour.
 
Yeh but the point is they didn't move at 15.

Heineken seems to be talking about project signings which are older players usually 20+
Yeah I appreciate that and I didn't mean to imply that was his position I'm just trying to get to what his actual views are or better put, what are his limits for what is ok and what is not ok. Where does he draw the line?

I'm not massively keen on Van de Merwe but I don't think he should be lumped in with people like Stander. Basically it's quite hard and I don't think it's black and white. As I say, I think most people would be happy if they just raised the residency rule to 5 years.
 
I understand the logic.
It's sad seeing "mercenaries" play for something that's meant to "mean" so much, but that's a point that has been argued about International rugby for years now

Although it made me giggle seeing Worcester claim DVDM as their 2nd ever Worcester Lion despite him not even training with wuss before the tour starts.

https://warriors.co.uk/2021/05/06/duhan-van-der-merwe-named-in-british-and-irish-lions-squad/


"Scotland wing Duhan van der Merwe will become Warriors' second British and Irish Lion following his inclusion in Warren Gatland's 37-man squad for this summer's tour of South Africa.

Although van der Merwe will still be an Edinburgh player when the tour begins, his contract with Warriors begins on July 1, two days before the Lions face the DHL Stormers in their opening match in Cape Town."

"It is terrific to see that Duhan has made the Lions squad," said Warriors Director of Rugby Alan Solomons.
"It's great news for Duhan and also for Worcester Warriors. All of us here at Sixways are chuffed to bits at having a Warrior selected for the Lions."
Te'o and VDM. Wuss really trying hard to kill what the Lions stand for... My new second team.


I'd back being a citizen of one of the 2 countries to be an Irish and British Lion tbh. It still means guys like Stander can play which isn't ideal for everyone but both countries have a requirement of living and working for five years to gain citizenship so it's a fair rule for all.
 
Top