dasNdanger
First XV
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2012
- Messages
- 1,750
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
I think das's comment on spitting is my view of it. It should never be tolerated in the game and as such deserved a lengthy ban. I fully agree that all the foul play duck pointed out was under-punished, but reducing the punishment for this wasn't the way forward, increasing punishments for dangerous acts is the way forward.
Yes, and YES...and not just because you agreed with me. I think dangerous acts, especially those that are purely spiteful, need harsher punishments. Biting usually comes with a year suspension, but not always, and penalties for eye-gouging - especially that which is obviously intentional - need to be stronger and more consistent, too. Consistency is key. If a player knows he'll be out for 18 months for biting, he will think twice before sinking his teeth into someone's finger or ear. If an eye-gouger knows he'll be out for 9 months, he'll think twice before he digs into someone's socket.
A player needs to know that he will pay a dear price for unacceptable behavior, especially that which intentionally injures another. Of course, rugby league's stink-finger maestro, John Hopoate, only received a 12-week ban for his proctological skills, and from where I sit I would think such a violation should call for a lifetime ban. But that was league, so maybe that played a part in the decision since I'm not sure how the oversight there works.
das [h=1][/h]