Scotland vs Argentina - 19/11/2022

[pagliaccio_euforico]

Ah yes the head protection that Herschel walker wore to keep his head safe.

 

[General Melchett]

I don't believe he deliberately targeted his opponents head,he built up momentum to effectively clear the ruck at that speed he was unable to be aware of his opponent's head position at the moment of impact.

I think you need an HIA.

 

[Leonormous Boozer]

I don't believe he deliberately targeted his opponents head,he built up momentum to effectively clear the ruck at that speed he was unable to be aware of his opponent's head position at the moment of impact.

If I drive at 80km/h around a school playground I would be unable to be aware of the position of playing children. I reckon I'd cop at least a 4 week driving ban if I hit one of the fuckers though.

 

[AlRums]

If I drive at 80km/h around a school playground I would be unable to be aware of the position of playing children. I reckon I'd cop at least a 4 week driving ban if I hit one of the fuckers though.

More likely 4 years banged up

 

[sergeblanco]

We won't end up with a sport at all after everyone has sued for injuries sustained, everything must be done to protect the players, not only for the health but the continuation of the sport.

Head impacts are part and parcel of rugby and always will be.

 

[AlRums]

Head impacts are part and parcel of rugby and always will be.

Not when they are deliberate

 

[Reiser99]

Head impacts are part and parcel of rugby and always will be.

Could you also explain how the red card has ruined the game?

 

[sergeblanco]

Could you also explain how the red card has ruined the game?

Scotland just answered for me.

 

[retired9]

The point on replay is that Arg 7 was watching Ritchie the whole time while going into that ruck. There was no need for the swinging arm and it cannot be described as anything other than deliberate. Red all day long it has no place in the game.

 

[General Melchett]

I'm starting a new porn channel called Finn's offloadhub

 

[Scotty]

I don't believe he deliberately targeted his opponents head,he built up momentum to effectively clear the ruck at that speed he was unable to be aware of his opponent's head position at the moment of impact.

So your defence is he flew in without looking where is opponant was? And the face he had clear line of sight to where the player was is lost on you? The players position didnt change much at all.


Your description is laughable here

 

[Reiser99]

Scotland just answered for me.

So basically you feel that players should be put in more danger for your entertainment. Got it, nice to know that you believe players should be sacrificing their health for your entertainment.

 

[Groundhog]

Lovely try there. Argentina incredibly passive defence

 

[Scotty]

Head impacts are part and parcel of rugby and always will be.

Exactly they cannot be completly removed from the game....do you not realise this is the reason why the laws are changed.. to stop players recklessly diving in and hitting a player in the head.

 

[sergeblanco]

Another red,must be !

 

[sergeblanco]

Outrageous it was a cheap head shot !!

 

[Reiser99]

Argentina need to practise clearing out.

 

[Scotty]

Another red,must be !

Yellow, didnt fly in and smash a player in the face with alot of force yet he did clear him out illegally.

Learn the laws please

 

[sergeblanco]

It's farcical!!

 

[Reiser99]

Lavanini was due a card tbh.