- Joined
- Mar 10, 2017
- Messages
- 3,703
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Duhan creates so much space by tying up so many players when he carries
20 min man down and forced sub. Then banned the same as red cards(as they are now). I dont want bigger bans as most are a moment of stupidity, bans should increase everytime if carded for the same offence as previously committed though.would love to see the red card ditched in favour of the orange card with massive punishment for the payers, something like first offence 5 weeks, second 10 so on so forth with very little room to lower unless it was clearly wrong.
Clear swinging arm to head without mitigation...i wish it wasnt a red as i was enjoying the game so much more bit it was a clear red card.I'm sorry, must be something wrong with the way I'm seeing it ,but that didn't deserve red !
I switched the tv off as soon as I saw the card coming out of the refs pocket,another match ruined.
Sounds good, just putting it out there as a general concept with not too much thought given to the finer points, just allows the game to continue as a spectacle IMO.20 min man down and forced sub. Then banned the same as red cards(as they are now). I dont want bigger bans as most are a moment of stupidity, bans should increase everytime if carded for the same offence as previously committed though.
By the laws it's a red. There was also no need to swing his arm into Ritchie's head. Also considering how many ex players have long term health issues from head knocks I fully support the laws.I'm sorry, must be something wrong with the way I'm seeing it ,but that didn't deserve red !
I switched the tv off as soon as I saw the card coming out of the refs pocket,another match ruined.
No one likes a fear mongererWe're going to end up with a sport where we get 30 players over-thinking everything.
Better over thinking than struggling to think later on in lifeWe're going to end up with a sport where we get 30 players over-thinking everything.
Why do you believe it wasnt a red? Just out of curiousity?I'm sorry, must be something wrong with the way I'm seeing it ,but that didn't deserve red !
I switched the tv off as soon as I saw the card coming out of the refs pocket,another match ruined.
There are 29 other players on the pitch who haven't swung an arm into anyone's head. There were 60 in the games earlier.We're going to end up with a sport where we get 30 players over-thinking everything.
How about making head protection obligatory for all players ?By the laws it's a red. There was also no need to swing his arm into Ritchie's head. Also considering how many ex players have long term health issues from head knocks I fully support the laws.
How about players learn how to clear out safely rather than people moan about laws designed to protect players from serious long term health issues.
We won't end up with a sport at all after everyone has sued for injuries sustained, everything must be done to protect the players, not only for the health but the continuation of the sport.We're going to end up with a sport where we get 30 players over-thinking everything.
Like the American fairies?How about making head protection obligatory for all players ?
There's no head protection proven to lower the chances of concussion. The average scrum cap slightly increases your chances and n-pros* are in trial stages.How about making head protection obligatory for all players ?
I don't believe he deliberately targeted his opponents head,he built up momentum to effectively clear the ruck at that speed he was unable to be aware of his opponent's head position at the moment of impact.Why do you believe it wasnt a red? Just out of curiousity?