<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (shtove @ Mar 10 2009, 11:14 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Logorrhea @ Mar 11 2009, 10:34 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (shtove @ Mar 10 2009, 08:13 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Rotation is fine early in the season. At the sharp end you put your best out every time.[/b]
You sound like E O'Sullivan
This
is the best team we can put out. Stringer for O'Leary has been debated for past month, as has D'Arcy for Wallace. Heaslip only got his shot because of Leamy's injury and Best for Flannery gives us extra grunt in the front row where we are probably going to take a pasting.
There is security in picking the same old team, time and time again, but I'm all for rotating a few here and there, just for the sheer feckin hell of it.
[/b][/quote]
Prophet in my own land - misunderstood :cryy: [small print: resident abroad, but willing to die so long as we repeat ... '48 (forty f***ing eight !? sad)]
This is NOT a rotation - it's the team for the slam.
No debate about Stringer.
Spot on with Best in front row, hoping lineout doesn't go ***s up.
Wallace - decent HEC player
v Darse - pure class.
Heaslip's champagne
v Leamy's woodstrip cider: different **** ups for different partys.
Bowe on the wing is the only worry, but I've banged on enough about bringing back Horgan for the slam winning cross kick. Fitzgerald has to be in. Earls is another season.
People calling for "form" players are the leEOSers!
[/b][/quote]
I think we just agreed there did we?