Not a whole lot. It depends on the year as every year the rights to televise it change, this year we don't have it live for free.. I think England has a lot of potential, they just need to play smarter rugby if they want to compete with the SH teams.
It will only be the worst 6 Nations if England win.
Well that depends on who you are doesn't it I'd lambast you for it if hadn't had an anyone but Wales mentality for the last decade .....
Have'nt been lambasted since my Grandad died.
Anyway looking forward to next week, best of luck.
No northern hemisphere teams in the last 4 of the RWC.
That was a crystal clear statement about the condition of northern hemisphere rugby.
The 6 Nations is hampered by three key elements.
1) Too many teams. One needs to drop off into the 2nd tier and that team needs to be Italy. They would burgeon with more success and beating smaller teams will help them gain support at home rather than getting pulped during the rounds by stronger teams.
2) This old tournament is crying out to be made home and away. By all means have a break in the middle but make it more meaningful. This tourney is over before it gets started.
3) January-Feb is a terrible time for the clubs to give up so many players. Shift it back in the year and make the weather better, the playing surfaces better etc.
I'll catch a few games of the 6 Nations but I would rather watch the Super rugby than the pedestrian northern ploddage.
I must say, this is not the fault of the players, the fans or the coaching staff.
There are plenty of fine players up here in the northern hemisphere.
The structure and placement of the tournament is the killer aspect.
Drop Italy, they are not improving after how long?
Create a 2nd tier and give them tv time as well.
I'd definitely watch Georgia.
Have a 5 nations home and away and a second tier 4 nations home and away.
After the first year have a promo-relegation element added in.
The winning team from tier 2 has to beat the losing team from tier 1 to get in to the top flight.
Otherwise... yes the 6 Nations has been lack lustre.
At the very least, bonus points, please.
Just award an extra bonus point for a grand slam.
As I've said before I think the best format is this:
4 Nations A:
England, France, Ireland, Wales
4 Nations B:
Scotland, Italy, Georgia, Romania
Home and Away games making for a total of 6 games for each team (1 more than current 5). Each weekend there will be 4 games (2A and 2B which will again be just 1 more than currently). At the end the winner of B plays against the loser of A in a promotion/relegation match at neutral ground. All in all 2 weeks extra, hopefully no more whipping boys, extra participation from Georgia and Romania and more rugby to watch!
Ugh, I don't agree with that. There's bigger issues in our club game and the amount of matches we play in a season. If we did change it I'd want a triple crown championship playing home and away and then have France, Italy, Romania and Georgia in one, not a hope the FFR and FIR would agree to that.The 6 Nations needs a serious overhaul IF the northern hemisphere is going to have a competitive springboard to attack the big three in the south
The 6 Nations needs a serious overhaul IF the northern hemisphere is going to have a competitive springboard to attack the big three in the south