Hmmm, what to say about this match. Scrappy and error-ridden would be an understatement for the first 60 mins, though there was some better rugby in the last 20.
Discipline really let Argentina down - Albacete was the main culprit getting penalized 4 times alone. Argentina didn't really get the dominance up front that many expected. Perhaps they themselves were expecting to obtain dominance, so weren't as committed as they have been previous, though I think fatigue played a big factor in this match. Argentina have played a largely unchanged pack during the entire tournament, and you could see they were becoming less effective as the tournament progressed. Though you would expect pro rugby players to be able to keep up the intensity throughout a 6 week tournament, if you look at the way the Argentina pack played in some of those early matches it is probably unsurprising that they failed to keep up the same intensity! To be competitive with the top teams Argentina do need to find a way to keep up the same intensity every match, and for this they need some depth. This isn't going to develop overnight, and I'm hoping to see more players given a chance during the end of season tour.
I thought the Argentine loose trio were pretty good yet again. However I wonder if it is time for them to look at a bringing in another dynamic forward into their loose-forward trio - especially if they are going to be playing a more expansive game plan. Farias Cabello has been very solid throughout the tournament, but I felt Senatore and Leonardi (barring this match) have looked very effective when they have been on the field, though ideally I think they should consider a genuine openside flanker (maybe de la Vega in the future?). Landajo looked threatening again with ball in hand, but his defense was poor for a second week in a row. I think he is worth persisting with, but he does need to be making his tackles, otherwise opposition teams will continue to make breaks around the halfback channel.
I'm sure Australia will be happy with the win, if not the performance they put on the park. I thought the tight 5 did ok, and Robinson made a good impact (particularly in the scrums) when he came on. I hate to say it (as I am one of his biggest critics), but I thought Higginbotham had a very good game. His defensive work was strong, he actually hit a few breakdowns, and he was quite effective with ball in hand (particularly his offloading). He seems to have improved as a test player as the season has progressed - it seems he has been told to get off the wing and start playing like a forward, and he obviously has listened! Hooper was good yet again, though did get himself penalised a few times. He made one superb 60 metre run breaking 3-4 tackles which was probably the highlight of the entire match. It will be interesting to see what they do when Pocock returns, as it would seem a waste not to have both Hooper and Pocock on the park. I think the Aussie selectors have to let Samo go back to his retirement home, as he really showed his age this match. He still runs ok, and tackles pretty well but his work at the breakdown is completely ineffective. He seems to arrive at the breakdown and ever so gently lean on it - I saw Argentina turn the ball over 2-3 times after Samo failed to clean out the breakdown effectively.
Beale was easily the pick of the backs for me, and looks far more comfortable at 10 than at 15. If Australia can get the likes of Genia, Ashley-Cooper, and O'Connor back they could be a deadly backline with Beale at 10. McCabe was solid as always, while Tapuai had a mixed debut. His defense was solid, and he made a couple of nice half breaks, but he did butcher a try scoring chance when he choose to run himself instead of passing to the unmarked players outside. Ioane had a big work-rate, but his handling let him down numerous times, while Harris was pretty solid at fullback (and his goal-kicking was very valuable). Cummins like Tapuai had a pretty mixed debut, with a few handling errors, but his defense was impressive.