• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Roundabouts and other driving pet peeves

It is. It's a "must" under rule 60 of the HWC. Are police stopping cyclists at night currently?
Can't see them can they.

I go for a run at half five in the mornings and I'm safer running in the road with my chest lights on than dodging the constant flow of bikes and e-scooters with no lights tearing along the pavements.
 
Can't see them can they.

I go for a run at half five in the mornings and I'm safer running in the road with my chest lights on than dodging the constant flow of bikes and e-scooters with no lights tearing along the pavements.
I don't ride at nights. It's suicidal on the roads even with lights. But these new laws won't change much without proper enforcement. It's just political gesturing IMO.


Stupid and potentially dangerous cyclist
Yes, but he walked away from it. And at least it was on mountain bike trail and not in an urban area.

Here's another Daily Fail article from last year, along with the Torygraph that's very anti cyclist:


Not once does it put into context that vehicles seriously injure or kill around 30k per year. Whipping up the culture wars on the roads even.
 
Here's another Daily Fail article from last year, along with the Torygraph that's very anti cyclist:


Not once does it put into context that vehicles seriously injure or kill around 30k per year. Whipping up the culture wars on the roads even.
There is no context needed, car drivers and their insurance is held accountable by law.

Cyclists as pointed out in the article aren't held accountable at all as very much itemised in the article with two specific cases. That's 30 dead people with no responsibility at all.

The laws must be changed and registration, insurance and if need be a tax has to be levied/mandated to protect those who are injured or killed by cyclists in the same way drivers are.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Top