Second, third, fourth and even fifth divisions already exist. The only thing missing is promotion to Six Nations:Second division introduced to he Six Nations which runs at the same time would be ideal with promotion / relegation.
If you give an extra week for test matches they will play Barbarians, PIs, or any other team generating more revenue than Georgia and Romania. That's what happens in test windows.Return it back to the 5 Nations.
Give the extra week for the 5 nations to play the Rugby Europe teams.
Second, third, fourth and even fifth divisions already exist. The only thing missing is promotion to Six Nations
Anyone who replaces Italy will continue to be hammered.
When you've got a lack of funding in a country and the main players not continually playing in good club sides it will always be tough.
Replacing them with Romania / Georgia would make no difference as they'd still be the whipping boys.
Second division introduced to he Six Nations which runs at the same time would be ideal with promotion / relegation.
If Georgia replaced Italy the government would jump on the bandwagon and fund rugby more.
You mean Georgia where they have all that money in the economy?
I'm no economist but the Georgian GDP is nearly 4,000 whereas Italy's is nearly 36,000
On those numbers I'd say Italy would be better placed to fund rugby than Georgia.