I tend to be not very categorical when it comes to this sort of calls. I watched every single angle 10 times (each), heard 50's pundits and at least 20 ref's opinions about.
You could have seen me arguing against the Spanish when de jong wasn't red carded in 2010's final (there is a potential scenario the ref could have considered which is consistent with his decision, albeit unpopular).
Or against the Argentines when Neuer nearly decapitated Higuain in 2014 but could still see both sides of the argument.
I cannot, for the life of me, understand how an impartial (doesn't really care who wins) fan/pundit/referee can look at that play on TV, from those angles, and still claim it is not a penalty.
I just can't.
You could easily argue there were at least two penalties in one single play (push and kick).
I am by no means a Real Madrid supporter. I like some of it's players (Modric) and despise pretty much everything others bring to the table (Ronaldo).
I couldn't give a flying turd if they win or lose.
I understand why everyone goes against Madrid (Juve was the cinderella story here) and considering the past (RM got two controversial goals last 2 seasons against Bayern and Atletico).
I get it, people like payback and they like to see Real Madrid lose. Me too, but not by creating new interpretations of the rules (or new rules altogether).
That play, that exact same play happens in the middle of the field and it would have been a yellow card and even the most staunch Juve supporter would have called his player a bloody idiot, deservedly so.
It is mind blowing that so many people do not understand the rules. I can understand why pro real madrid people will have a particular view like the people against them will have the opposite one. Not my point. At first i thought it was a minority but no, there are TONS of people, former player, coaches and refs who are known to have no affiliation and still claim there was no penalty or that the penalty is dubious.
I am flabbergasted. Lost for words.
I can even understand the "you don't call that on the 93rd minute". It's an idiotic argument, but it basically admits it is a penalty. But no, some people, people who made money out of the sport for a living who watch that play and sincerely think it was not a penalty.
It's as if someone created two rule books and gave half the planet one and the other half the other, just to see what happens.