Alright, I'm dragged back in because there's so much wrong with this post.
Those who seek equity must do so with clean hands - Legal concept prevalent in English and Irish law. A brief explanation would be that those seeking an equitable remedy in court, such as an injunction stopping a person or organisation from doing something, must act equitably themselves, considering the RFU benefit from the exact same practice as the SRU/IRFU, albeit with the thin veil of letting English clubs do the dirty work for them, if they were to seek equity a court would simply point to Ben Te'o, Nathan Hughes etc... and would qualify the RFU for having rather dirty hands. I could give you a history lesson on Equity, its evolution from the Court of Chancery and how its generally seen as the most fair and moral branch of law but I reckon, if this post doesn't do it and I doubt it will, it wouldn't stop you're belief that English **** don't stink or stop you throwing around insults. "Those who seek equity must do equity would likely quash their claim too!
If we go back to what you said that made me bring up Bruce which was "It may read the same to you but it isn't to anyone else." Bruce clarified his support for the English was due to not wanting young fellas in Scotland getting ousted by these "blow ins" that's not in agreement with your point, he actually supported the residency rule, I've also got a number of "upvotes" on my comments which would further disprove this point.
Country of birth ≠ Nationality.
The RFU believe they're better than this carry on while benefiting from it themselves, if that's not hypocrisy I don't know what is, maybe check your dictionary because mine is pretty spot on and "No it is NOT hypocrisy because we are not doing the thing we want to stop" is not the definition of the word. (I'd also like to point you back towards that beauty of a legal paragraph which ties in fantastically to that sentence!)
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/hypocrisy - Just in case.