S
shazbooger
Guest
Jesus where do I start, with your hypocrisy? Your exercise in creative writing or your continued references to Irelands performance (or lack of) in this world cup. Most of what you wrote has no real relevence, but while I'm loath to respond at all, theres just too much bullshit.
I even pointed out the important bit. Here hold on I'll highlight it for you………. Unfortunately, now that England have gone through, we can be sure that the final will at best be 98% attrition, 2% rugby, at worst it will be another 36-0 hammering.
Your re-interpretation is just an exercise in creative writing. I think it's something you would like to believe I would think, as it gives you a straw or two to grasp onto. It's no where near correct. In fact you effectively agreed when you said you dont think England have much left in the tank. Again you say it and it seems okay, I say it and I get berated for being an anti-English turd (amongt other things).
Sorry I kind of lost interest after your first reference to Ireland. Jesus you're an admin here yeah? At least try to police yourself to stay on topic will you?
and I said well done England. What is your point? You went in and said well done France, then slate the NZ for being Chokers. I did the exact same thing. Yet somehow you're right and I'm wrong? Stop wasting my time here.because I congratulated France on a superb victory[/b]
Nope. As I said, and I thought I was quite clear. It's the fact that this team has admitted publicly and privately that they are incapable of playing anything close to creative rugby. They are content to kick the ball long, don't put pressure on the receiver and rely on their defence. Admirable trait's if you're an English fan, dull to watch for any neutral.It has everything to do with it. [/b]
I even pointed out the important bit. Here hold on I'll highlight it for you………. Unfortunately, now that England have gone through, we can be sure that the final will at best be 98% attrition, 2% rugby, at worst it will be another 36-0 hammering.
Your re-interpretation is just an exercise in creative writing. I think it's something you would like to believe I would think, as it gives you a straw or two to grasp onto. It's no where near correct. In fact you effectively agreed when you said you dont think England have much left in the tank. Again you say it and it seems okay, I say it and I get berated for being an anti-English turd (amongt other things).
Now you pay attention, because basically when I see... [/b]
Sorry I kind of lost interest after your first reference to Ireland. Jesus you're an admin here yeah? At least try to police yourself to stay on topic will you?
Nope. I can't revise what I didn't feckin say. Jesus do you actually read peoples posts before you begin preaching or do you prefer to just make it up as you go along. Show me where I said I didn't belittle France's performance. I thought it was quite fecking obvious.And you said you didn't belittle France with your stupid screaming and stomping? Care to revise that statement?[/b]
Eh …………. Hold on, last time I checked I said I was disappointed you guys qualified and you went on two continued rants about Ireland. Explain to me again how the performance of the Irish team has anything to do with England's style of rugby? Explain to me again why you brought it up?Don't you dare be lazy and play the victim card. [/b]
Ahhh I see. So because it's an England victory, we should only express select opinions, and ignore the facts that it was 1) a fecking horrible match to watch 2) It sgoing to give us a fairly **** final?It was actually an abstract way of saying "stop being a miserable turd and congratulate both sides on a match well fought." Close mate but no cigar. [/b]