Rugbyfan564
Academy Player
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2023
- Messages
- 492
I think the cost of the contract means it will only ever go to those who is fit are likely to be value for money and actually play (Either as starter or from the bench) 8 or more matches a season. So it won't ever be used to tie down prospects who are not yet ready to appear that often, There is no scope for a lower salary contract doing the same thing for prospects.Players Id have liked to see being offered a central contract (whether they'd accept or not):
Underhill - starts when fit, and needs his game time carefully managed.
AOF & Fasogbon - too young to be playing much, already with concerning signs around that. A limit from above could prolong their career by 1-2 RWC cycles!
Underhill must wonder that Borthwick doesn't really like him for some reason.