And then the cream of the crop. CNN going for gold:
I don't think you really believe that... You know what you're doing.Trump being right by fluke is little more than a broken clock being right twice a day.
He had absolutely no basis to his decision whatsoever.
But little pesky facts like that don't appeal to the shitforbrains trumpers. A bad decision that works out through blind luck is still a bad decision.
The guy is a billionaire, he'd have investments in just about every sector.Did Trump know 3-4 weeks ago that ventilators were doing more harm than good? If so, why did he not spread that knowledge instead of peddling anti-malaria drugs that he has investments in?
Again, being right by fluke is nothing more than luck.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news...ule-financial-stake-in-chloroquine-maker/amp/A New York Times story highlighting President Trump's "small personal financial interest" in a French pharmaceutical company that sells the brand-name version of hydroxychloroquine went viral Tuesday, as pundits and activists ignored the fact that Trump's holdings likely amount to less than $1,000 and that the company does not sell the drug in the U.S.
...
According to Trump's 2019 financial records, he owns between $1,000 and $15,000 in the Dodge & Cox fund, which owns approximately a 3 percent stake in Sanofi. If all three of his family trusts hold the full $15,000 in Dodge & Cox — $45,000 in total — then a 3 percent share amounts to $1,350. If, alternatively, each trust has invested the minimum $1,000 — for a total of $3,000 — the 3 percent stake is worth $90.
You're taking what I was saying out of context.This isn't a right v left thing...
This, particularly inane, debate started with Cuomo asking for a large number of ventilators and apparently not needing them because NY was past the peak, well they had their record number of deaths yesterday and one of their highest rises in cases, so theres no correct answer on that yet. What is true is that no other state will need as many as NY because of population and population densities and the virus hitting them later giving them time to prepare, so NY having a large reserve while they're in the thick of it makes sense.
Honestly, how many times does this need to happen before you realise the mainstream media doesn't care about the truth anymore regarding Trump. I've bolded the important bits.What is undeniably the fault of the man at the top is that he has weakened an already unbelievably **** healthcare system and disbanded the pandemic response team, which is why no one in the country had/has a ******* clue what's going on. Considering this sort of outbreak is known to have been more and more likely to happen with overpopulation both of those are, to quote the semi-literate halfwit who the buck stops with, were "very horrendous" decisions.
No, the White House didn't 'dissolve' its pandemic response office. I was there.
Tim Morrison is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former senior director for counterproliferation and biodefense on the National Security Council.
President Trump gets his share of criticism — some warranted, much not. But recently the president's critics have chosen curious ground to question his response to the coronavirus outbreak since it began spreading from Wuhan, China, in December.
It has been alleged by multiple officials of the Obama administration, including in The Post, that the president and his then-national security adviser, John Bolton, "dissolved the office" at the White House in charge of pandemic preparedness. Because I led the very directorate assigned that mission, the counterproliferation and biodefense office, for a year and then handed it off to another official who still holds the post, I know the charge is specious.
Now, I'm not naive. This is Washington. It's an election year. Officials out of power want back into power after November. But the middle of a worldwide health emergency is not the time to be making tendentious accusations.
When I joined the National Security Council staff in 2018, I inherited a strong and skilled staff in the counterproliferation and biodefense directorate. This team of national experts together drafted the National Biodefense Strategy of 2018 and an accompanying national security presidential memorandum to implement it; an executive order to modernize influenza vaccines; and coordinated the United States' response to the Ebola epidemic in Congo, which was ultimately defeated in 2020.
It is true that the Trump administration has seen fit to shrink the NSC staff. But the bloat that occurred under the previous administration clearly needed a correction. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, congressional oversight committees and members of the Obama administration itself all agreed the NSC was too large and too operationally focused (a departure from its traditional role coordinating executive branch activity). As The Post reported in 2015, from the Clinton administration to the Obama administration's second term, the NSC's staff "had quadrupled in size, to nearly 400 people." That is why Trump began streamlining the NSC staff in 2017.
One such move at the NSC was to create the counterproliferation and biodefense directorate, which was the result of consolidating three directorates into one, given the obvious overlap between arms control and nonproliferation, weapons of mass destruction terrorism, and global health and biodefense. It is this reorganization that critics have misconstrued or intentionally misrepresented. If anything, the combined directorate was stronger because related expertise could be commingled.
The reduction of force in the NSC has continued since I departed the White House. But it has left the biodefense staff unaffected — perhaps a recognition of the importance of that mission to the president, who, after all, in 2018 issued a presidential memorandum to finally create real accountability in the federal government's expansive biodefense system.
The NSC is really the only place in government where there is a staff that ensures the commander in chief gets all the options he needs to make a decision, and then makes sure that decision is actually implemented. I worry that further reductions at the NSC could impair its capabilities, but the current staffing level is fully up to the job.
...
No people are wrong all the time, doesn't matter who they are. But "liberals" in the context of Trump don't care about who is right and who is wrong, or the motive, they just care about scoring points against their sworn enemy. He humiliated them and their pals so they have a score to settle. But seemingly unbeknownst to them they're scoring own goal, after own goal. Because they don't let up even in a time of crisis and NEVER admit if they were wrong about him. And the worst is that nobody seems calls each other out about it. Just move onto the next thing."Liberals" don't need to be right for the Right to be wrong.
It shouldn't be a right vs left thing but unfortunately that's exactly what the Democrats and media have turned it into in the States. And what people on this forum are lapping up no questions asked.
You're taking what I was saying out of context.
No, no you're missing the context too.Yeah that'll be why he got 12 likes and counting for his post.
2 of 2 due to character limit
Honestly, how many times does this need to happen before you realise the mainstream media doesn't care about the truth anymore regarding Trump. I've bolded the important bits.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...-didnt-dissolve-its-pandemic-response-office/
Sounds like the semi-literate halfwit probably made the USA's pandemic response team more streamlined and efficient, and ironically the biodefense team was not touched at all.
So who's lying here about what happened to the team? Who is gaining from a perception that things are in shambles? Who benefits?
No people are wrong all the time, doesn't matter who they are. But "liberals" in the context of Trump don't care about who is right and who is wrong, or the motive, they just care about scoring points against their sworn enemy. He humiliated them and their pals so they have a score to settle. But seemingly unbeknownst to them they're scoring own goal, after own goal. Because they don't let up even in a time of crisis and NEVER admit if they were wrong about him. And the worst is that nobody seems calls each other out about it. Just move onto the next thing.
I pointed out to @TRF_Olyy that his ever popular post was wrong and I get a lame response about my source being dodgy. No further discussion needed there. Too inconvenient to actually care about what is the truth. He got his pat on the back for his service to operation 'Orange Man Bad'.
Just as I've shown that a large portion of the premise of your post is wrong too because the "disbanding" of the pandemic response team was completely misrepresented. But of course none of your back patters checked on what you said either.
Please provide a reference about how he "weakened" the health care system and how this affected the USA's response to the pandemic.
I have a feeling there's a misinformation in that one too. It's so predictable
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN21C32MThe Global Health Security and Biodefense unit — responsible for pandemic preparedness — was established in 2015 by Barack Obama's National Security Advisor, Susan Rice ( here ). The unit resided under the National Security Council (NSC) — a forum of White House personnel that advises the president on national security and foreign policy matters.
In May 2018, the team was disbanded and its head Timothy Ziemer, top White House official in the NSC for leading U.S. response against a pandemic, left the Trump administration, the Washington Post reported ( here ). Some members of the global health and security team were merged into other units within the NSC, the article said.
In an op-ed for the Washington Post, Beth Cameron, former Senior Director for Global Health Security and Biodefense in the NSC, wrote, "When President Trump took office in 2017, the White House's National Security Council Directorate for Global Health Security and Biodefense survived the transition intact.
"Its mission was the same as when I was asked to lead the office, established after the Ebola epidemic of 2014: to do everything possible within the vast powers and resources of the U.S. government to prepare for the next disease outbreak and prevent it from becoming an epidemic or pandemic. One year later, I was mystified when the White House dissolved the office, leaving the country less prepared for pandemics like covid-19"
I was clearly referring to Amigo's (who is clearly firmly on the left) unwillingness to acknowledge when Trump is right about something. This was a perfect test case because Trump was overwhelming right this time and if he gave in, other parts of the USA would be stuffed.
To Amigo, it has to be a fluke, a random act in the chaos, because he is irredeemably evil and incompetent.
I find this amazing, a 97 year old Brazilian woman survived the coronavius. Wow!
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-healthcare-coronavirus-brazil-survivo-idUSKCN21U0R3?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR0H4gGED8uRGpzvZ5SQ4pTy3kQPSFyLW2EJ4aXCYS-i6Jz1leV4UaQ9XTI
Trump has now retweeted a post calling for Dr Fauci to be fired, but let me guess that's just "orange man bad" isn't it and not Trump being a ******* self-centred **** who can't stand the fact that Fauci dared criticise how he handled the crisis?