- Joined
- May 6, 2010
- Messages
- 2,112
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Fiji could certainly put out a better side, Zimbabwe would improve dramatically. Scotland on the other hand....
Anyone like to try the Scottish side?
Fiji could certainly put out a better side, Zimbabwe would improve dramatically. Scotland on the other hand....
To be fair, I forgot about Kuridrani, Kerevi and Naholo. Fiji's squad would be quite a bit better.
To be fair, I forgot about Kuridrani, Kerevi and Naholo. Fiji's squad would be quite a bit better.
1) Jamie Bhatti 16) Ross FordAnyone like to try the Scottish side?
Country of Birth simply doesn't work there are plenty of athletes throughout all sport who would be competing for countries they literally barely remember living in.
Honestly I'd consider removing parents as a qualification (not going to happen) and make all about residency 10 years or majority required to qualify with any year below the age of 18 counting for double. If you manage to multi qualify you can select.
Interesting video on the subject here from Two Cents Rugby. He admits that his system of eligibility might not be perfect but is probably the fairest overall, which is purely country of birth.
Some interesting results...
I watched the video, I have no idea where you are drawing conclusions that he portrays this as "his system of eligibility" and he thinks it is "the fairest overall".
He makes no such judgements.
That the Scottish 23s don't look awful is testament to the quality of some of the young players coming through. Even three years ago drawing up such a team would have been incredibly difficult.
The same applies to Italy, the reliance on Southern Hemisphere is starting to subside.
Wales:
Rob Evans
Elliot Dee
Samson Lee
Alun Wyn Jones
Seb Davies
Ellis Jenkis
Justin Tipiruic
Josh Navidi
Gareth Davies
Rhys Patchell
Liam Williams
Scott Williams
Owen Watkin
Josh Adams
Leigh Halfpenny
That's still a decent team for Wales but the bench would start to look a bit weak.
England could have Jon Davies and George North who both were born there but moved to Wales when they were about 2.
1. Healy
2. Best
3. Furlong
4. Ryan
5. Beirne
6. O'Mahony
7. Van der Flier
8. O'Brien
9. Murray
10. Sexton
11. Larmour
12. Henshaw
13. Ringrose
14. Earls
15. Kearney
16. Cronin
17. McGrath
18. Porter
19. Henderson
20. Leavy
21. Cooney
22. Byrne
23. Stockdale
Unavailable starter: Stander (SA)
Unavailable 23: Carbery (NZ) Murphy (Spain)
Unavailable squad: Aki (NZ) McGrath (Canada) Herring (SA) Bealham (Australia) Marmion (England) Roux (SA) Ruddock (Wales) Addison (England) Arnold (England)
This shows and slightly exaggerates how Ireland use the project player system for the most part. They don't go for guys for the 23 because then you'll just be trying to beat other teams with players they don't need and that won't work. Having them as your own back ups because you don't produce as many players as NZ, SA and England due to the sheer numbers game has seen them become very competitive.
There's five residency guys in there, two of which aren't the last guy in their position to make the squad.
Carbery is the bigger of the two losses to the 23 too imo.
Augustin Pichot is after tweeting out a list of tier 1 nations' foreign born player percentages.
It's an endorsement for Argentinian rugby and he's probably trying to push something through that he thinks will give the pumas an advantage because that's about 98% of what he does in WR but it's relevant to this thread nonetheless.
Other teams playing foreign born players isn't the reason Argentina are crap
Plus his numbers are wrong, England's is 25%, for example.
Plus when you factor in the age of some of the moves (Earle born in Hong Kong due to parents working there, moved back before he even started infants, Underhill similar story, Joe C moved to England when he was 2). There's plenty of poaches/dodgy grannys in international rugby but these percentages don't tell half the story.