If the TMO didn't correct him then maybe.....the TMO agreed with him?
Referee asked him two or three times whether he agreed with the red card, and each time he said yes.
Let me first say that I have no dog in this fight.
I don't agree that the TMO concurs with the referee's decision to give a red card. Check out the look on Keith's face when the referee says red card.
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1075035555843623
Keith then suggests he look at it in real time. IMO, he was doing his best (within the stupid limitations imposed TMOs by WR) to tell the referee that he was going down the wrong track.
I really have no idea why WR feels it has to hamstring the communications between referee and TMO by making everything in codes. Just let the TMO speak in plain language....
"Craig, I think it was accidental, I don't think White 8 was trying to kick the ball"
IMO, there is no way this was ever a red card. I don't see any indication that White 8 was attempting to kick the ball at all, with either foot. All I see is a running player slowing down and not stopping in time. (the ground level goal-line view from behind White 8 shows this best). A 100kg plus player cannot stop in one stride; its physically impossible
I have read some people suggesting he should have jumped over North, but he simply wasn't in position to do that, and if he tried, he could have ended up sprigging north in the face.
If you think this really was a red card, then you have to agree that this was one as well....
If we use the same flawed logic applied by the referee to the Hughes decision, then Jones should have seen Leonard's head was close to the ball, and should not have tried to kick it.