I'm having a discussion about this at work and it would be great to get some insight from some of you guys here.
Why are the Jaguares XV playing in the Currie Cup 2nd division? Surely it's quite an expensive exercise to have a team based in South Africa for however many months this tournament runs? What is the domestic tournament setup like in Argentina? Is this a factor of nothing competitive enough within Argentina to ensure the players develop? Or is there a lack of funding to organise a multi team Argentinian domestic tournament, or a lack of skilled domestic players?
We really know nothing here so would be great to get some insight.
Jaguares XV arrived in SA at beginning of July & they'll be out of the country by the end of August
They're based in a University Campus learning English & developing as young players and men
That's a pretty great thing (getting them to learn english). Even if professional rugby doesn't work out for all of them, at the very least they should all come out of this with a decent english speaking ability (both from being in SA and from learning it in the Uni). Personally I also like the fact that there is this strong relationship between South African and Argentinian rugby, and that we are doing quite a bit to help develop the rugby there.
But there is still the question of why? Is there not enough funding or enough high quality players to create a strong domestic tournament within Argentina? Is there not a tournament already?
I haven't seen anything that prevents them from being promoted ( @heineken, have you seen anything different?) but I don't think it will be easy for them, even if they do get promoted. For the Jaguares, this is essentially the youth/second team to the Jags as all the best players will be in the Rugby Championship, whereas for the Bulls, Sharks, Western Province and Lions, it's the Super Rugby team minus 5-8 players each, so still pretty formidable and most players will Super Rugby experience. That will be tough to play against, but good to develop the players with strong opposition.
That's a pretty great thing (getting them to learn english). Even if professional rugby doesn't work out for all of them, at the very least they should all come out of this with a decent english speaking ability (both from being in SA and from learning it in the Uni). Personally I also like the fact that there is this strong relationship between South African and Argentinian rugby, and that we are doing quite a bit to help develop the rugby there.
But there is still the question of why? Is there not enough funding or enough high quality players to create a strong domestic tournament within Argentina? Is there not a tournament already?
I haven't seen anything that prevents them from being promoted ( @heineken, have you seen anything different?) but I don't think it will be easy for them, even if they do get promoted. For the Jaguares, this is essentially the youth/second team to the Jags as all the best players will be in the Rugby Championship, whereas for the Bulls, Sharks, Western Province and Lions, it's the Super Rugby team minus 5-8 players each, so still pretty formidable and most players will Super Rugby experience. That will be tough to play against, but good to develop the players with strong opposition.
England coach Eddie Jones has cruelly dismissed the Jaguares' Super Rugby influence on Argentina ahead of the Rugby World Cup.
The South American outfit made their first Super Rugby final on the back of an outstanding season before being outsmarted 19-3 by the champion Crusaders in Christchurch last weekend.
Many, including All Blacks coach Steve Hansen, believe the steady development of the Jaguares in the southern hemisphere provincial extravaganza will benefit Argentina's World Cup cause, especially with the side stacked with so many Pumas who will now pull on test jerseys.
Where did you get it as dying from?Currie Cup dyingTime to give it some life
Allow Jaguares XV to play WP Bulls Lions Sharks Free State etc
Its me but i dont give a damn about this year RC. I just want to have all the players healthy for the RWC.
You cant have two priorities between the two things you are trying to prioritize. If everything is a priority then nothing is a priority.Don't get me wrong, the rwc is the priority for sure, but so it is for the ABs.
I guess this is where we disagree (not that there is anything wrong with that).
You cant have two priorities between the two things you are trying to prioritize. If everything is a priority then nothing is a priority.
The idea of prioritizing is, precisely, to sacrifice one or part of one in order to allocate more resources to the other.
For me, especially given the year we had (tons of traveling, more games, less rotation than the rest) and give the group we have (Fra, Tonga, Eng are the first 3 games, all very physical) i would avoid risks in the RC.
Again, it's fine to disagree. I am just willing to sacrifice all the RC for a better chance at the WC.
Our chances? What do you think our chances are? 50%? 20%? 10%? 5%? 1%?I was saying that the ABs have the priority of the RWC too, so they are resting players too and that increases our chances.
A: What color is the ballI largely agree with this sentiment
However I would go very hard for the 1st 2 games in TRC