On the one hand - it's a pity it has to be the Friday; but so be it.Final date now set 30th March.
Player management will be key as chiefs and bath are playing this friday and next friday. They are starting joe simmonds this weekend so can only imagine steeno starting next weekend. No LCD in the AP game, does that mean hes been rested for the AW final and jack innard in bench in each.
Hope they dont both play a first team in the AW final.
who else should Bath have picked? Name names please. Uninjured onesIt 'll be baths first team against Chiefs 2,3,4th string if they name the same sides they were going to put out last week before the postponement. Cant believe Bath were expecting their first team to play Chiefs twice in 5 days- 2 different Chiefs side mind you.
The postponement certainly did Bath a favour.
Tonight should be close.
The Anglo Welsh is an annual competition, it hasn't been sprung upon Bath out of nowhere. They, like Chiefs, should've built squad depth to be able to field a 2nd choice team. Also it wouldn't hurt to dig into your youth academy a bit and play guys like Partington, as Chiefs have done with the likes of Kenny, Snow and Morley.who else should Bath have picked? Name names please. Uninjured ones
How is Friday to the following Friday only 5 days?
Yes, I had noticed.The Anglo Welsh is an annual competition, it hasn't been sprung upon Bath out of nowhere. They, like Chiefs, should've built squad depth to be able to field a 2nd choice team. Also it wouldn't hurt to dig into your youth academy a bit and play guys like Partington, as Chiefs have done with the likes of Kenny, Snow and Morley.
How do you know what side Bath would have put out today if they did play 5 days ago?
Kinda just sounds like you're trying to score points at how Exeter aren't playing their 1st XV in the final and throw shade at anyone who puts out even close to a strong side in the LV=.
Kinda just sounds like you're trying to score points at how Exeter aren't playing their 1st XV in the final and throw shade at anyone who puts out even close to a strong side in the LV=.
Clearly this season has shown that teams can and will approach the cup however way they want. Whether or not that's a good thing I don't know, as it's muddling the identity of it and has kinda ended up somewhere between a serious cup and a cup for developing strength in depth. Not even sure I see the point in it anymore and can't say I've watched much of it since the last time it was considered a top level competition.
Interesting to see this debate on the strength of sides considering that this season the majority of AP sides have fielded more or less strongest available sides in the pool stages? Definitely seems to be the most serious the AP sides have taken the LV since it was switched over to a development competition.
Exeter fielded what looked to be a close to strongest available side (not including international call ups of course) back in November vs what was essentially a Scarlets academy side, so not completely sure they have a leg to stand on in moaning about the Bath side being strong?
Clearly this season has shown that teams can and will approach the cup however way they want. Whether or not that's a good thing I don't know, as it's muddling the identity of it and has kinda ended up somewhere between a serious cup and a cup for developing strength in depth. Not even sure I see the point in it anymore and can't say I've watched much of it since the last time it was considered a top level competition.
Wouldn't mind seeing a FA cup style knock out tournament instead, with maybe the top Championship clubs (especially if ring fencing comes in) as well as the Welsh Regions, maybe even with the top Welsh Prem sides too considering the demise of the B&I Cup.
Wouldn't mind seeing a FA cup style knock out tournament instead