- Joined
- Jun 30, 2018
- Messages
- 6,044
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Army vs Navy has been added before the USA Eagles vs All Blacks match on October 23. Two for the price of one!
This 1996 team v the 2015 RWC winning team. Who wins?
I think the 2005 all black team was better than the 2015 team.
huge bolter, only 5 super caps
...yeah, im going to need some context to thatanyone know why we never play england?
Apart from at the world cup we've played them once in the last 7 years. I don't really know how fixtures get organized, but seems like someone doesn't want theses matches to be happening...yeah, im going to need some context to that
Your union needs todirectly negotiate with the unions you want to play against. If there is no matches you know where the problem lies. Maybe a lack of desire.Apart from at the world cup we've played them once in the last 7 years. I don't really know how fixtures get organized, but seems like someone doesn't want theses matches to be happening
And there would be so much interest from NZ if we had one on this tour.
I wonder if it's NZ or f it's england, or they can't agree who gets the money, or ?Your union needs todirectly negotiate with the unions you want to play against. If there is no matches you know where the problem lies. Maybe a lack of desire.
For the Springboks we don't play the French very often, I am ok with that as the French are too eccentric for my taste when it comes to negotiations.
That's my understanding. Trying to strong arm the RFU into a deal that sees NZR get more money doesn't work the same way as it does with other unions because the RFU don't struggle to sell out Twickenham against tier one opposition, so given the choice between playing someone else on a standard deal and giving NZR a larger share, the RFU are better off playing someone else.Sounds likely. I guess it's a tough deal because the viewers would be english but nzr will claim the viewers are there because the all blacks are playing.
What review? They extended his contract not long agoTypical procrastinating from the NZRU - haven't heard anything about the Foster review ? ...the NZRU need to grow a pair & get rid of him asap, so a bloke like Robertson can replace him, the next head coach needs as much time as possible to prepare for the 2023 RWC in France, starting in Sept.
We all know this current NZRU board is pretty incompetent, so it's hardly a surprise they have dug such a big hole for themselves - they didn't have a choice but review Foster after the UK Tour, not only did we lose our last two tests, but we were bloody appalling in both of them, lack of direction & tactics etc, the latter clearly a huge concern... Foster would have to be the worst ABs coach I have ever seen.It would be a new level of incompetence to renew him just before the tour and then review just after