psychic duck
International
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 5,094
I think that's a bit unfair on McCabe.
First of all he's not fast enough to be an international winger, especially for a side like Australia.
I don't think he has the game to play fullback at that level either, his kicking game is much too poor. He's a centre or nothing else at this level, and imo he's the 3rd best 12 you have behind O'Connor and Tapuai. What other options do you realistically have at the moment?
At least he straightens the line, tackles very well and is regarded as a leader.
McCabe outran an international winger against Argentina, despite only just returning from injury.
Disagree entirely. Almost ever international team is opting for a harder running 12, rather than a more creative option, and for good reason. How many teams in international rugby that have a creative 12? Nonu? F Steyn? de Villiers? Barritt? Sean Lamont? Roberts? Heck England have even played Manu Tuilagi at 12 recently! There is an odd occasion where international teams play a more creative option at 12 - what I would consider a traditional 'second-five eighth' (e.g. England playing Farrell at 12, Argentina with Fernandez at 12), but this is very rare these days, where previously it was the norm.
Strangely though, both the fly halves who play centre at international aren't very creative at all.
Farrell is probably one of the least creative centres there are, he only plays there because he is a capable tackler. Playing him as a centre lessens England's chances of scoring a try by about 50%.
Argentina meanwhile are the exception to the rule of ball carrying centres. They play two fly halves in Fernández and Bosch at centre. They only play this because they seem to rarely get big monster ball carriers in their backs (young winger Montero who is upcoming is an exception), and the tactic of two fly halves hasn't really worked either, as both those fly halves just aimlessly shovel the ball down the line and don't draw defenders.