If things sta
More like Roy King
I love the guy, but was he is saying is dead wrong. This is not a YC for wearing the armband trade. It is not. That is not how it works.
The ref would ask the captain to change it, and if he didnt he would get a YC. Then the ref would ask again (you cant just continue the game with items that are forbidden by the laws of the game), and here is where it becomes interesting. He either gets another YC (=red) or changes it (to anything acceptable as per the rules). If he changes it, the entire point he was trying to make is not only null and void, but he ends up looking like a buffoon, too.
Now lets assume he stands his ground. He gets a second YC, red, gets sent off. He made his point, but things arent over yet. Now his team is 10 vs 11 AND, and this is the relevant part now the armband goes to another player. What is that player going to do? If he changes it, he not only looks like a fool, but he also converts his captain's sacrifice, a big one, into a worthles endeavour.
If he sticks to the armband then he will be rec carded (2 ycs) and the armband passes to another player, who faces pretty much the same choice (bit easier thou, as a) they're already 9 vs 11 and b) it's easier to follow than to lead).
This iteration will continue untill the team has 5 reds. At that point the match is suspended/forfeited.
If you are going to try and do this you need to make team decision before the game starts and stick to it no matter what. You want to make a point? Consider the consequences and make sure everyone is onboard. Otherwise it fails, maybe even spectacularly. In a nutshell when you consider this, you need to consider the very real possibility of losing hte game 2-0 (that's the rule as i recall) and have 4 players suspended, god knows for how long. I'd asume they're out of the tournament.
That is the cost you need to be willing to pay in order to make a point.
It is worth it imo, but i do see how steep of a price it is.
Again, viewing this as an armband for a yc exchange is wrong.