- Joined
- Jan 16, 2020
- Messages
- 4,803
France didn't cause it. It's one bigoted Englishman on here who can't help himself.Yay only took 4 game to get this thread more amazed it took to France to cause it rather than England or Ireland.
France didn't cause it. It's one bigoted Englishman on here who can't help himself.Yay only took 4 game to get this thread more amazed it took to France to cause it rather than England or Ireland.
Your translation skills are top notch.France didn't cause it. It's one bigoted Englishman on here who can't help himself.
France didn't cause it. It's one bigoted Englishman on here who can't help himself.
Or Scottish.If he's an Englishman he's probably playing in the welsh team then???
*bants
Over my head I'm afraidYour translation skills are top notch.
ncurds post made zero sense to me.Over my head I'm afraid
I assume he meant that he's surprised this match thread has turned to a **** show after a France v Wales game and not England or Ireland.ncurds post made zero sense to me.
Good question. Tough one as we've lost 3 games obviously.On a separate note @Welsh Exile who have you been most pleased with (welsh player wise) so far this 6 nations?
This is what was meant.I assume he meant that he's surprised this match thread has turned to a **** show after a France v Wales game and not England or Ireland.
nothing wrong with Edwards style defence, France are one of the most exciting teams to watch.Sean Edwards has done more to ruin union with his league-style defence systems than anyone.
True - but i suppose that i'm not that interested in watching highly-drilled defence systems stifling attacking rugby. I can admire the effort of a team scrambling in their 5 metre zone but prefer seeing teams exploit space options in attack elsewhere. It's why i love the introduction of the 50-22 option.nothing wrong with Edwards style defence, France are one of the most exciting teams to watch.
Good defences aren't the problem it's Gatland style attacks which do sweet FA.
I quite like Biggar for a Gatland-ball approach to the game and think he has been integral in a lot of Welsh success. But, I remain baffled by the lack of chances Patchell has had, especially under Pivac who knows him so well. I suppose that is the most damning indictment of Patchell, that Pivac won't even pick him. Is Anscombe also out of consideration? So much talent at 10 for Wales, so little experimentation.I think there's a number of reasons for our poor attack.
1. Biggar can't run an effective attack. 99 caps for Wales, and he's yet to show real attacking edge other than the odd cross kick. He relies on others, e.g. Tomos Williams last week. Paralels can be seen with Scarlets this season - have looked dross with Dan Jones at 10 who's a similar kicking 10 to Biggar. Patchell has made a huge difference, and Wales could do worse than turning to him at 10, or Jarrod Evans.
2. Our centres are poor in attack. JD2 was overall poor v France and is a shadow of his former self. Watkin is solid defensively, but doesn't offer much in attack. North comes back in at 13 once he proves his fitness, but 12 is a massive issue. A second playmaker wouldn't go amiss, or a big battering ram to generate momentum.
3. Our lineout is still a big issue. 100% return looks good on paper, but despite picking Seb Davies as another jumping option, we still didn't throw to the tail. Shows the lack of confidence in our throwers. By the end of the game France were flooding through to Hardy as he took another ponderous middle/front ball and stopped our attack dead by either smothering Hardy or forcing a poor pass.
4. Ball carrying. Just one-up runners so we struggle to make much momentum. When we do, our runners are isolated at the breakdown resulting in either slow ball, or a turnover.
These have been issues since Pivac took over though, so not sure what's going to change. Whatever we're trying to do isn't working, so thr gameplan probably needs to change. Our only solution to the lineout seems to be Tipuric, we're lost without him, but we need to figure it out.
To be fair, Patchell has been out injured for the majority of Pivac's time in charge of Wales. He's only just returned for the Scsrlets after prolongued concussion issues.I quite like Biggar for a Gatland-ball approach to the game and think he has been integral in a lot of Welsh success. But, I remain baffled by the lack of chances Patchell has had, especially under Pivac who knows him so well. I suppose that is the most damning indictment of Patchell, that Pivac won't even pick him. Is Anscombe also out of consideration? So much talent at 10 for Wales, so little experimentation.
Easy to look good when you can just give it to Radradra or Piutau and watch them create something from nothing.Pivac likes Sheedy, but I'm not convinced. He was seleced based on Bristol's success, but they have/had gamechangers all over the park which Wales don't really have.
Edwards hasn't made a single tackle on Friday night, so you might give some credit to the players who actually did !No-one I know have been claiming moral victories, jusy lamenting our continuous failings in key areas of thr game. Can't challenge without an attack.
France weren't great yesterday, resorted to kicking everything instead of playing their natural game, but defensively they were very good, typical Edwards defensive system that pressured us and our skills let us down. France lose that game without Edwards as defense coach.
Of course, but it's pretty obvious that Edwards is one hell of a coach who knows how to structure a defense. He did it with Wales for a decade, and there's no denying that as soon as he goes to France their defense also turns from one that would leak soft tries and penalties to one of the best in the world!Edwards hasn't made a single tackle on Friday night, so you might give some credit to the players who actually did !