- Joined
- Dec 13, 2013
- Messages
- 26,138
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
It's rare that a rugby match could have no possible bad result for me as a fan.
Just avoid the four try draw and I'll enjoy this!
It's rare that a rugby match could have no possible bad result for me as a fan.
Just avoid the four try draw and I'll enjoy this!
Depends what the purpose is.Would you continue with the Malins debacle on the wing?
We'll get lost in a lifelong endless battle of one upping each other.Jokes on you because I'm going to become EVEN MORE insufferable if we win
But Jones hasn't done that with any other of the much more vital positions so I don't think that's his logic at all. I think he rates average Malins as the next best wing after our injuries.Depends what the purpose is.
IMO, he's second choice FB for the RWC; maybe in the 23 shirt absent any injuries.
In which case, getting as much game-time into him as possible; whilst not sacrificing game-time for the first choice FB (Steward) makes perfect sense - especially if the aim is to get rid of Daly...
But it means sacrificing performance now, for gains to be had down the road - which we 100% know is an Eddie thing - and a thing I don't have a problem with per se - I just wish he wouldn't make quite so many short-term sacrifices for that aim.
why would Jones do that with FB but not with any other more key positions? I think that would be a lovely view but it's pure guesswork.Depends what the purpose is.
IMO, he's second choice FB for the RWC; maybe in the 23 shirt absent any injuries.
In which case, getting as much game-time into him as possible; whilst not sacrificing game-time for the first choice FB (Steward) makes perfect sense - especially if the aim is to get rid of Daly...
But it means sacrificing performance now, for gains to be had down the road - which we 100% know is an Eddie thing - and a thing I don't have a problem with per se - I just wish he wouldn't make quite so many short-term sacrifices for that aim.
Fitness permitting and provided he plays there for his club etc I'd definitely have Watson as the alternative to Steward.Depends what the purpose is.
IMO, he's second choice FB for the RWC; maybe in the 23 shirt absent any injuries.
In which case, getting as much game-time into him as possible; whilst not sacrificing game-time for the first choice FB (Steward) makes perfect sense - especially if the aim is to get rid of Daly...
But it means sacrificing performance now, for gains to be had down the road - which we 100% know is an Eddie thing - and a thing I don't have a problem with per se - I just wish he wouldn't make quite so many short-term sacrifices for that aim.
Because there aren't any other positions where the 2 candidates are both novices, and one of them is capable (at club level, at least) of playing a different, less important position which has a current vacancy, and doesn't need a new infusion?why would Jones do that with FB but not with any other more key positions? I think that would be a lovely view but it's pure guesswork.
Weird to bring them into camp, then - I know it means he gets a closer look at them, but if he's no intention of playing them then surely leaving them undisturbed at their clubs to train/prepare/play would be better for their progressI've read in various places that Jones thinks Willis is as much as 8 or 9 months away from getting back to his real peak plus Underhill isn't yet fit enough for international rugby.
Presumably, he's made that assessment having now seen them train and put them through his fitness assessments.Weird to bring them into camp, then - I know it means he gets a closer look at them, but if he's no intention of playing them then surely leaving them undisturbed at their clubs to train/prepare/play would be better for their progress
It makes sense.I've read in various places that Jones thinks Willis is as much as 8 or 9 months away from getting back to his real peak plus Underhill isn't yet fit enough for international rugby.
Apparently the 34 man squad announced yesterday will be trimmed to 27 to travel to France late tonight. Will be v interesting to see which back rowers make the trip.
I guess the thing is that they're the only 2 open sides in the 34 man squad so unless they are miles off the pace I'm assuming at least one will travel.Presumably, he's made that assessment having now seen them train and put them through his fitness assessments.
It also keeps them in the loop, and sits them in for the analysis and tactical meetings.
Not to mention the psychological impact of a "we still love you, we still want you" message.
For the sake of what? 2 days away from their clubs, who don't have anything important on the horizon, and they're unlikely to miss anything of any importance.
Now, why do you lot keep pushing me into "defend Eddie" mode? I'm really not comfortable there, and would far rather be taking swipes at him!
He had a rib injury. Not sure how that's progressing but he's not in the 34 anyhow.What about Ludlum? (Apologies if I'm mistaken and he is not in the squad)
A back row of Lawes, Ludlum, Dombrandt could be quite a handful.
Yeah but POM is a **** on the pitch so that counts as mitigationJust as a testament to the dumbassery of Ewels, literally 5 seconds before he tackled James Ryan, he put in an almost identical tackle on Peter O'Mahony, fully upright and in danger of head contact. What total stupidity, you cant even suggest its a one off after seeing that