I'd definitely be closer in agreement with
@ncurd . I think England in 2019 were an exceptional side with a lot of guys at their absolute athletic peak, but they weren't the cleverest at all by any means. Outsmarted by Wales and then beaten physically as well as tactically by South Africa. Since then, and until yesterday, teams just knew they had to deal with England physically and they'd probably beat themselves through bad discipline.
It's the opposite side of the same coin as us in 2018, an exceptionally clever side who needed parity up front to win games, but if you beat us physically like Wales, England and NZ did in 2019 (Japan was different because once Sexton was out the brain left the team and injuries did play a part overall) we were a shadow of that team.
I think both teams need a bit of a remodelling, and to be fair to both coaches they appear to be trying with a shift in tactics, but both are doing it with guys who were pivotal when the teams were good who aren't what are needed. Healy, Mako, Daly, Earls and Murray are all guys who aren't capable of starting and performing in the manner that international rugby is currently being played but would probably be stellar bench options, both teams have issues in the halfbacks that the coaches are very slow to address and, fortunately for England their problems seem to stop there for me, we have more.
A bit of a tangent there but ultimately England do need to change their focus, gameplan and personnel up, but not as much as many seem to think and they were very, very good in 2019 but not a smart enough side to win a world cup. Yesterday was pretty big for them in my opinion, they weren't incredible and France should be sick with themselves really, but it was a very mature performance to stick in there and take the chance to win. If we pulled something like that off next week I'd be quite optimistic.
Edit: Worth noting that the SF was overrated though, still very very good but not the best performance ever like was touted. That NZ team weren't incredible at all, a few teams had thoroughly controlled them throughout the world cup cycle. Comfortably the third best side at a rather weak tournament.