- Joined
- Jan 16, 2020
- Messages
- 4,848
Again, I'm not debating any of this at all. I personally don't care. I think they are/were both world class players and if you want to say Matfield is the GOAT then cool.Well his last test was in a Semi-final of a World Cup against NZ in 2015. Plus he did win the World Cup, Tri-Nations, B&I Lions tour, Currie Cup, and Super Rugby trophy.
He was also feared by all teams for his reading of line-outs and stealing of opposition ball.
He is in the GOAT category when it comes to locks...
AWJ - not so much.
And we are not trembling in our boots that he's coming with the Lions....
The point was, seeing as they weren't singling out any of AWJ's weaknesses/perceived weaknesses and were just focussing on his age, that it's a bit weird considering one of the greatest SA locks ever was Matfield and he played well into his late 30s. So clearly they don't have an issue with age but more ability (and I guess you'd say Matfield is so good he's the exception which is fine) and if that is so then why just say how old is. Why not say he's slow or weak or clumsy or whatever. Why the fixation on his age.
I think it's because that sort of roast humour plays better than a proper analysis of AWJ's strengths and weaknesses so they go for the "he's an old ****" and leave it there. Similar to the Hamish Watson "he's a hobbit" critique. Size and age are easy I guess.