Who's next in line for the back 3 bench spot?
Who's next in line for the back 3 bench spot?
Edit: lol forgot about Solomona
Been on fire the last two weeks to be fair,
Not as well rounded as some other options but is an incredible finished, and with his shirt chipping game he makes defences **** themselves anywhere in their own half
If Mercer was ~105kg then I'd agree that there wouldn't be huge issue with his size at international level. My problem with it is that I don't believe he's anywhere near the size he's been listed as; I reckon he's less than 100kg. And that is too small.In terms of stat collection - already done for you:
https://www.therugbyforum.com/threa...-england-04-02-2018.40642/page-16#post-887406
Zach Mercer: 190cm; 105 kg (BMI: 29.09)
Sam Simmonds: 184cm; 103kg (BMI: 30.42)
Louis Picamoles: 192cm; 116kg (BMI: 31.47)
Sergio Parisse: 196cm; 112kg (BMI: 29.15)
Taupe Faletau: 189cm; 110kg (BMI: 30.79)
Jamie Heaslip: 192cm; 110kg (BMI: 29.84)
Kieran Read: 193cm; 110kg (BMI: 29.53)
David Pocock: 183cm; 103kg (BMI: 30.76)
Billy Vunipola: 188cm; 130kg (BMI: 36.78)
Nathan Hughes: 196cm; 125kg (BMI: 32.54)
Ben Morgan: 191cm; 116kg (BMI: 31.8)
Thomas Waldron: 185cm; 114kg (BMI: 33.31)
The only reason people seem to think that 110kg is too light for a #8 is Billy Vunipola; who is an absolute physical freak. There is no-one in world rugby even close to him in terms of physical stats without playing front row.
What you're used to skews your perception of "normal" - I have big dogs; normal sized dogs look tiny; I have small cats; normal sized cats look huge. England have a huge #8; all other international #8s look too small in comparison. However, looking at the list of top international #8s, someone like Mercer really isn't giving up much already.
I know, I know, people say that there's absolutely no way Mercer can be 105 kg - because of their perception bias (or they're thinking of him a year ago). Stand him next to Billy; and he's lightweight. Stand him next to Faletau; and he's a little smaller; but there's really not much in it; mostly upper legs- lower torso.
ETA: Different stat.s available for Zach.
RFU = 103kg
ESPN = 104kg
Bath = 105kg
Wiki = 105kg
RugbyProfiles = 108kg
For those interested; Charlie Morgan one of his usual excellent write-ups of Zach a couple of weeks ago: http://subscriber.telegraph.co.uk/r...s-want-see-zach-mercer-back-premiership-duty/
The back row is the more pertinent question, Shirley?
What do you base that on though?If Mercer was ~105kg then I'd agree that there wouldn't be huge issue with his size at international level. My problem with it is that I don't believe he's anywhere near the size he's been listed as; I reckon he's less than 100kg. And that is too small.
Didn't realise Daly was fit again,
Bit of a risk throwing him straight into an international after 4 months out isn't it?
True - he DOES have (just) the lowest BMI on that list after all; which would make him appear the skinniest of them.I think people are forgetting how tall 6'4" is...
I have no trouble believing he's over 100kg whatsoever.
Tigs Man will not like this at allAny more risky than playing Jonny "where am I, Mum" May?
Who's next in line for the back 3 bench spot?
Edit: lol forgot about Solomona
Been on fire the last two weeks to be fair,
Not as well rounded as some other options but is an incredible finished, and with his shirt chipping game he makes defences **** themselves anywhere in their own half
The back row is the more pertinent question, Shirley?
Of course, the next skinniest is Parisse; who's not done too bady for such a lightweight.