I'm OK with Ackerman's decision to rest players, it makes sense, and even if they lose they have a relatively easy run. They've already dispatched arguably their toughest foreign fixture.
I'm just saying it is a second team, Ackerman has made a decision to play a worse team, whether his reasons are good or not isn't what I was saying.
I'm actually one of the few people who still think he probably made the right call doing it last year as well. Everyone says he shouldn't have sent a weakened side last year but if he HAD sent a full stregnth side who knows what would have happened. Maybe the battered Lions wouldn't have made it to the finals.
In the end the Lions have decent depth but it definitely gets worse when they lose their stars, as we can see from the Currie Cup. To me Ackerman has sent this side to win if they can, but the team suggests winning is not the primary objective.
It may pay off handily, but it might also be Hubris, don't take your play-off spot for granted, maybe the other SA franchises will be more competitive this year.
I'm just saying it is a second team, Ackerman has made a decision to play a worse team, whether his reasons are good or not isn't what I was saying.
I'm actually one of the few people who still think he probably made the right call doing it last year as well. Everyone says he shouldn't have sent a weakened side last year but if he HAD sent a full stregnth side who knows what would have happened. Maybe the battered Lions wouldn't have made it to the finals.
In the end the Lions have decent depth but it definitely gets worse when they lose their stars, as we can see from the Currie Cup. To me Ackerman has sent this side to win if they can, but the team suggests winning is not the primary objective.
It may pay off handily, but it might also be Hubris, don't take your play-off spot for granted, maybe the other SA franchises will be more competitive this year.